true, but it's taken from the debian arm build now I believe

so should behave the same as the debian and ubuntu arm builds

(which of course it doesn't)

does anyone know if voxpupuli/webhook-go works with g10k ?

I've got it working a bit, the maintainer is doing a re-write and the deployment automation is not in place (when I last looked)

think he's re-written it in go

yeah, it's go

just found my test node

@xorpaul (g10k author) is on this slack. No idea if he actively uses it

@xorpaul (g10k author) is on this slack. No idea if he actively uses it

I goofed and need to do a 1.0.1 release of falco ... sorry about that! https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-falco/pull/10

My latest puppet-grafana PR should be ready, but is https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-grafana/runs/6590107518?check_suite_focus=true#step:4:58 a new test failure? Seems unrelated, but I don't think it affected my other recent PRs.

See the

puppet-grafana

module at https://forge.puppet.com/puppet/grafana?src=slack&channel=voxpupuli

saw that a few times on other PRs today. I guess github runners are a bit unstable. I restared the jobs

I've rebased a couple of times already today. Failed every time so far I think.

mine passed after some time

This message was deleted.

speaking about it, mind taking a look at https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-systemd/pull/274 ?

If mine looks ok, I think I need to work on https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-grafana/issues/95 next.

If mine looks ok, I think I need to work on https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-grafana/issues/95 next.

@bastelfreak You ok with my first grafana PR? (The one to add org support for users will probably hit the same code. I don't think I'll make it a separate type as suggested in issue 95 if I can help it)

yes looks good to me

ta

Hello, I have a question regarding "*webhook-go*" project - is it a good idea to add support for some flags?

$ /opt/bitbucket-webhook/webhook-go --version
flag provided but not defined: -version
Usage: server -c {path}
$ /opt/bitbucket-webhook/webhook-go -version
flag provided but not defined: -version
Usage: server -c {path}
$ /opt/bitbucket-webhook/webhook-go -v
flag provided but not defined: -v
Usage: server -c {path}
$ /opt/bitbucket-webhook/webhook-go --help
Usage: server -c {path}
$ /opt/bitbucket-webhook/webhook-go -help
Usage: server -c {path}

(I dont understand what "Usage: server -c {path}" mean 🙂

I would assume it's webhook -c /path/to/config/file

that's not the first time arg0 is not handled properly 🙂 Check PE, for instance. all

puppet infrastructure run

commands show

bolt plan run

in help instead

that's not the first time arg0 is not handled properly 🙂 Check PE, for instance. all

puppet infrastructure run

commands show

bolt plan run

in help instead

@tuxmea @bastelfreak you’ll be “happy” to know that we’ve removed the partner badge from the f5 module. With any luck, this will prompt them to publish some updates so we can reinstate it.

I do not expect any updates from them that solve more issue than creating new ones

that’s also my expectation 🤷