(across all of your services)

puppet is 100% reliant on dns and TLS CN for how all of its connectivity works

Hello, I sadly see recent announces from perforce and future of Puppet, OpenVox is the fork driven by community, any plan to make it supported by Linux fundation (as Opentofu) ? to ensure "no glue" with any external company ?

so VoxPupuli is part of the Open Collective, and we're discussing LF or other options this week at Config Management Camp

@ahmet2mir do you see a benefit in joining the Linux foundation?

governance / visibility / potential funding

Vox already has a governance system and a funding system through Open Collective

https://opencollective.com/vox-pupuli and https://voxpupuli.org/elections/

Lumiere, have you checked the docker compose file (pastebin)? All the services are connected to the same bridge, so Docker system is responsible for maintaining the correct DNS entries for each of the services.

I know election / conduct etc of voxpupuli cause i try to create a community driven entity in our company and VP was one of my favorite

You advice me to set FQDN for my puppetdb server? Right?

I am not a docker person KpuCko, but yes

I see, ok. Make sense. Thanks Lumiere.

@ahmet2mir I explored myself a few options, and it seems that Commons conservancy and OpenCollective (and provably the Linux Foundation) are all equal (equally good I guess). They offer legal assistance and they are all home for the OpenSource projects. As far as I know Commons Conservancy is European, while OpenCollective is based in the US. Are there other differences that matter? Is it worth or necessary to switch, or is it possible to belong to multiple foundations? I've been trying to help because I have the right people in my organisation to assist me with this matter and these type of questions. In the meantime Ben has already applied for the funding... and at the end of February I'll have a conversation in my office with the person from the funding organisation... however, at FOSDEM, I was told that they are overwhelmed and we might need to wait a couple of months. Question: Is it possible to apply for funding against multiple foundations? Answer: I have no idea. I'll ask this question to Michiel Leenaars on February 28th. This is more or less the status of the art.... you'll find the submission proposal and the discussion on GitHub. If you have proposal feel free to share or you have any information that we're not aware, please let us know ... P.S. I never mentioned the fact that my colleague is part of the board of Commons Conservancy... however, we may not need to get to this...

whohoo my renovate feature request was converted to issue (from discussion) https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/issues/33994

whoa i'd love to see that

Though I fear the day when all vox-modules will use that

nice

that slack image is not visible outside of slack, it seems like

why is it always so annoying to get the repository name in a github workflow

ewoud: binford2k Spritzgebaeck https://github.com/voxpupuli/modulesync_config/pull/941/files?diff=unified&w=1 not tested, but this will attach the module .tar.gz to the github release. afterwards puppetmodule.info could link to the github release directly, without the forge

@Massimiliano (Max) your inline edits are really abusing the IRC bridge 😛

bastelfreak: but how we check if there is a release?

stupid solution: the README.md just has a badge to the latest release. there's an API for that

ah okay

speaking of stupid


how do people manage modules nowadays? monorepo? Puppetfile? g10k? librarian? right now we have a monorepo with a Puppetfile and librarian, but librarian crashes often, is slow, and doesn't help much with keeping track of upstreams, particularly when working on forks

and link to https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-bolt/releases/latest

i'm considering switching to g10k but keeping the monorepo (with -clonegit in some instances) but we have a reaaally bad bug in g10k in debian right now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093015