There is a support thing on it also

I know 6.5 is working and officially supported but didn't know if 6.5a works well. Would like to upgrade my lab

@User has joined the channel

Anyone using Samsung 960 EVO on SYS-5028D-TN4T and can share some feedback?

Would like to equip each of my lab hosts with 1TB 960 EVO but was reading some very bad reviews from users that couldn't "retrieve" used space on Windows

i have 950s still

i know @User and @Jason Samuel have some experience

I believe mine is 850 in the superserver. will check in a bit

Mine is still 950 Pro, was issues with 960 not showing up, but this was fixed with new firmware.

@User: is running it, but not active here, try twitter

950 pro still here also

@Jarian Gibson you must have an infinite budget!

lol nope. Wasn't that expensive either

Anyone got any experience with pfsense? Got the weirdest situation! Flat 192 network, so I use XenServer and DVS to create a virtual 10.x network. I put pfsense in as the firewall but with no real rules (any/any). Created my domain controller and everything seems to be working. Windows services, ping, etc; all resolve correctly and all seem to work. What doesn't work is browsers... any browsers. I can drop the machine back over to my prod network and it's fine, put it back behind pfsense and the browser stops working. Totally baffled!

@User: that sounds very similar to what @User experienced. It was an MTU issue with a buggy driver

@User probably a dumb question but I had a similar issue recently and it was the default router and DNS settings.

@Jarian Gibson Have you tried Blink monitoring system? I have a 5 camera system since a year and It's awesome!

@User: @User may know

@User: It's not DNS. There's no way it's DNS. It was DNS. ;)

^ lol

Hrm... ok. Any pointers @dready on where to look? DNS seems to be functioning fine as far as I can tell, since I can resolve the hosts with ping. Just get page cannot be displayed in the browsers.

Actually @User issue was he hadn't applied the driver correctly

Once he reapplied it everything worked fine

@User I just published a blog post on using VyOS, check it out, you'll be up and running in 3 minutes - https://xenappblog.com/2017/vyos-virtual-router-on-nutanix-ce/

Thanks... seems basically the same as what I did with pfsense. I'm not sure where my error lies truthfully, whether it's the firewall or the Windows VMs themselves. Maddening to see it resolve the host but not get any data in the browser 🙂

Unlike OpenWRT or pfSense, VyOS is more similar to traditional hardware routers, with a focus on comprehensive support for advanced routing features such as dynamic routing protocols and command line interface. However, we do not neglect other features such as VPN and firewalls.

I had the same problem yesterday, with RAS acting VERY strange on Nutanix for some reason. Even better, the low foot print.

Ok, I'll give it a try then 🙂. I'm not wed to pfsense it was just easy.

I'm not wed to anything, as long as it works 🙂 Tested okay also on XenServer