1. If you change L1 to 0.6, it would actually mean 0.6 x 12 = 7 months.
2. Why is the L1 range so narrow? Wouldn't the amount of skill a person gains actually be on a sharper curve in the beginning of their career?
3. Ideally, the ranges should have overlaps. This helps in the long-term. For example, if say you have the L1 range from 2L to 5L, and the L2 range from 4.5 L to 7L, it would be a good idea. (The numbers are just examples, to explain the logic). Because, let's say you have an L1 who is really good, but not worthy of promotion to L2, or you don't have promotion slots in a particular year, etc, you can still give them pay hikes and show them how their salary is actually at par with or higher than an entry level L2.