Hi <!channel>, I have a quick check to run by you ...
# help
a
Hi <!channel>, I have a quick check to run by you guys. We are ready to do our first release of nfcore/mcmicro (dont mind it is called 2.0.0) I am looking at the checklist in the (nf-co.re)[nf-co.re/docs/developing/pipelines/release-procedure] to make sure we check all the boxes. Is there anything else we should have in mind?
šŸ”• 16
j
Just to let you know, you alerted and asked all 14,434 people on this channel to run your quick check šŸ˜… ..Which is probably more of an issue for allowing everyone to tag channel on these really big channels..
100 rainbow 5
i
That was loud mate. Other than that, not much, the checklist is very comprehensive. The real to-dos will surface during release review, if you haven't done it yet. Next time please send the message without a tag, we will see it next morning.
p
..Which is probably more of an issue for allowing everyone to tag channel on these really big channels..
Ask Slack, please šŸ™šŸ» (been wanting that feature for many years)
Also #C04QR0T3G3H is a better channel for this kind of thing next time @Alex
j
Getting a bit off-topic, but trying to be solution oriented here.. I mean I've had pretty good success with configuring Slack workspaces using the channel specific permissions for here/channel mentions, combined with role specific tagging permissipns.. You should be able to e.g disable channel-tagging for this channel for others than admins etc..
šŸ¤” 1
m
we are on a slack Pro plan, so we can only limit things in #CE6P95170 (which is our #C09V1G966U8):
j
Makes sense @mashehu šŸ‘ Looks like the ones I've been maintaining are on Business+, which allows e.g.: • Channel specific limits for channel/here-tags • Warnings for channel/here-tags • Role specific enabling of channel/here-tags I'm sure that Pro makes most sense for you, and did not know that these specific features were in the Business+ plans..
šŸ‘šŸ» 2