https://linen.dev logo
Powered by
# haxe-ui
  • b
    @User
  • b
    yes i can xD
  • b
    works this end
  • b
    okay ... yes after restarting haxe compiler it works xD
  • b
    it gots me every time
  • b
    what version of haxe are you on? Ive been using vscode (in linux) for a pretty huge project and never seem to get any issues
  • b
    sometimes completion is a little slow, like 1-2 seconds, but thats about it i would say
  • b
    4.2.4
  • b
    right, i think im on that too... or slightly less, but, well, it blows up my hypothesis that its all good in later versions 🙂
  • b
    It happens to me often that Haxe swallows something. And the worst is when I then still work with kha.
  • b
    i hope for haxe async
  • b
    I've been waiting for it for a long time xD I hope for it with every version. But unfortunately this is very dragging ahead.
  • b
    @User just as a question: How active is this template? https://github.com/haxeui/haxeui-blank
  • b
    I need to create a static html backend
  • b
    pretty up to date... it should compile... i feel like i used it fairly recently
  • b
    okay evtl. it can help to "copy" the html5 backend and replace all with an virtuell dom
  • b
  • b
    But than i need to fork this also xD (or make a smaller alternative based on generic elements (tagname, etc.))
  • b
    ... could be interesting, i was talking with something fairly recently about this type of thing...
  • b
    where a haxeui backend would be "remote"
  • b
    about static html?
  • b
    ah, maybe i misunderstood - not about static html, but where the front end talks to a haxeui-backend that lives virtually on a server
  • b
    Currently I would consider keeping it simple with a simple element classe that simply contains the tagname. For live previewing on vscode I would generate an html code each time the files are saved which is then displayed. So currently only useful for vscode. The remote also sounds very interesting.
  • b
    right, so you are talking about taking a haxeui and spitting out static html based on it
  • b
    i wonder if it would just be more useful to just load the .html that calls the has the src="app.js"
  • b
    ie, no need for static html
  • b
    I think in the preview no javascript is allowed
  • b
    then it would be a real live working ui
  • b
    what is the preview then? I know that before someone write a haxeui vscode plugin that was basically a browser
  • b
1...933934935...1687Latest