https://linen.dev logo
Join Discord
Powered by
# haxe-ui
  • b
    And checking if local states end up being the same. Soooo many little bugs caught by that after I thought it was working alright.
  • b
    Looking at the tests I did, just having 3 clients each add item, edit it, then undo both, then redo both...
  • b
    All the permutations of confirmations, and ending with the same result, whatever that is. 😄
  • b
    I think I will have nightmare again tonight...
  • b
    haha
  • b
    easy option: remove the undo button
  • b
    😄
  • b
    I've seriously thought about that a couple of times. 😄
  • r
    @bright-gpu-74537 I guess that being forced to add all controls to a new instance of a Toolkit spooked me 😅
  • b
    Copy code
    haxe
        Toolkit.init();
        ui2 = new UI2(spiro); // <--- haxeui custom component "extends Box ... ... extends Component ... ... ... extends Sprite
        ui2.width = 230;
        addChild(ui2); // <--- openfls Sprite::addChild
  • b
    you arent though, are you?
  • b
    a component is just a sprite (in haxeui-openfl) so you can just add using addChild
  • b
    Copy code
    haxe
var b = new Button();  // haxeui
b.text = "test";
Lib.stage.current.addChild(b); // openfl
  • b
    (for example)
  • b
    ... ... maybe im not getting what you mean "forced to add all controls to a new instance of a Toolkit" 🙂
  • w
    @bright-gpu-74537 haxeui-kha for iOS now crashes at startup, OSX native scales weird now... Do you want github issues for these?
  • b
    Hmmm... annoying... but android is better now? Issues sound great, easy to track that way
  • u
    @bright-gpu-74537 So I am implementing onKeyDown for haxeui-kha, but when say pressing Enter the keycode gets called but my component is not affected(i.e. I put a trace and saw that it was called). What I am wondering is do I have to specify the keycodes for haxeui or should I transform values (i.e. The keycode in haxeui for Enter is 23 but in kha its 13) ? I will look around in the codebase maybe I am missing something. Just a note that I implemented it in ComponentImpl and in ScreenImpl.
  • u
    I did Enter in a textfield( actually a textfield in a numberstepper but I imagine its the same code that gets executed)
  • u
    Oh ok so for the textfield I see that you dont get Enter or LF as a valid value and return( is this intended flow ? shouldnt we end the text modification and remove focus from the textfield)
  • u
    Ok just removing the return on LFcreates a bug(so that justifies it>)
  • u
    I will investigate all of this later; For now I can get the enter to remove focus but the caret still draws(I imagine I should do a final render call before onBlur when pressing enter) As for the bug I am talking about; when removing the LF at line 511 and pressing the arrow keys while in a textfield the values will go up/down with up/down arrows dont know if this is desired but it happens :P\
  • b
    So i guess the issues are two fold: one, the text input in haxeui-kha is totally custom in the sense that kha has no built in text input, so i had to build one... which as you can imagine, is a complex thing... so maybe that need some tweaks (been a long time since i looked at it)... and the second is if haxeui-core handles ENTER's in some special way, and what that special way should be
  • b
    is haxeui-CORE also handling the keyboard-inputs ? (for shortcuts setting?)
  • u
    Yes and no. If you want to set shortcut for commands you just need to use KeyboardEvent which is implemented in core but the backend takes care of setting the keycode values depending on how the backend handles input for keyboard. For the user though usually you would do
    Copy code
    @:bind(myvbox,KeyboardEvent.KEY_DOWN) 
function handleKeyInput(k:KeyboardEvent){trace(k.keyCode);}
    myvbox being a valid id in you xml file or class.
  • u
    If your using kha I am currently implementing keyboard event handling
  • n
    Is 
    @bind
    macro something that was added recently? Looks nicer than manual registerEvent.
  • u
    Been there for some time now.
  • u
    And yes its cleaner in code from my experience
  • b
    you can also use it bind variables to control values (two way)
1...137138139...1687Latest