https://linen.dev logo
Powered by
# haxe-ui
  • b
    Copy code
    if (x) {
    y = 1;
}
  • b
    it is more verbose, sure
  • b
    but verbosity isnt an issue imo
  • b
    i just think it looks cleaner:
  • b
    btw thats an example that contains everything
  • b
    i'd probably avoid it with the switch statement personally, it becomes hard to differentiate between the pattern and the body
  • a
    agree, the extra lines make things easier to read
  • b
    yeah, im not a fan tbh
  • b
    this idea of "less code means more" isnt accurate
  • r
    Verbosity is always preferred imo
  • b
    i agree 100%
  • b
    its not really that, its just making code shorter while maintaining full readability, but i guess thats only me
  • b
    and this: 
    var scaleW:Float = maxWidth != -1 ? maxWidth / image.originalWidth : 1;
    especially not, never, ever
  • b
    oh that was there
  • b
    i didnt add that
  • b
    whoops! 😄
  • b
    that should defo go
  • b
    even tho i lovvveeeee the ternary operator
  • b
    im guessing i didnt write that
  • a
    😂
  • b
    but the conditional extractig should remain, otherwise things look messy if theyre deeply nested
  • b
    this 👇
  • b
    i think it depends
  • a
    I agree with that particular design decision, i do that myself
  • a
    less nesting overall
  • b
    I'd do that in most cases, as long as the block isn't like 1 line or something x)
  • b
    nesting becomes messy real quick
  • b
    i think it depends on what "condition" is
  • b
    in the examples above, sure, no issue
  • b
    its always a condition, that if equals to false kinda just cancels the function
1...101010111012...1687Latest