# workers-discussions
- s
sathoro
02/22/2023, 3:06 PMI suppose that could work, I am not that familiar with ipv6. so if it is shorter than 39 does that mean it is a less specific address essentially? - s
sathoro
02/22/2023, 3:06 PMyeah I'm just not sure exactly what the shorter addresses actually represent - s
sathoro
02/22/2023, 3:07 PMlike is it actually possible that header would ever be something like
and what does that actually represent?::100 - k
kian
02/22/2023, 3:08 PMyou can omit
sections0000 - s
sathoro
02/22/2023, 3:11 PMso... if it contains
but is less than 39 length then I should expand it to the full format first then take the substring?: - s
sathoro
02/22/2023, 3:12 PMcan anyone confirm Cloudflare doesn't expand them already? I haven't seen any short ones in my logs - h
HardAtWork
02/22/2023, 3:12 PMWould probably be easiest to just parse it in place. But that requires you to understand how the compression works. - h
HardAtWork
02/22/2023, 3:12 PMI've seen a few compressed ones, so as far as I'm aware, CF just passes them along as is. - s
sathoro
02/22/2023, 3:13 PMokay ty, I will check for a library to handle this. I thought my simple approach might be enough lol - s
sathoro
02/22/2023, 3:14 PMđź‘€ - v
vasco-santos
02/22/2023, 3:58 PMHey workers team, We submitted a while ago request to get sub-requests limit increased in our account. The use case where we hit this limit quite easily is a lot of requests from worker to R2 buckets. We did not get any answer on this form submission so far. Is there other suggestion route to go? From technical standpoint, it would be rad if we could simply get no sub-requests being accounted for interactions with workers bindings like R2 buckets. - k
kian
02/22/2023, 4:03 PMR2 buckets are already counted towards the inhouse limit of 1,000 per request - k
kian
02/22/2023, 4:03 PMAre you hitting that limit? - v
vasco-santos
02/22/2023, 4:38 PMYes, we can easily hit 1000 limit for bigger files if R2 interactions count as sub-requests - k
kian
02/22/2023, 4:39 PMWhere did you submit the limit increase anyhow - v
vasco-santos
02/22/2023, 4:47 PMyes in same request. Limit increase form you can see after table in https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/platform/limits/#account-plan-limits - v
vasco-santos
02/22/2023, 4:49 PM@kian to better describe use case we have, we are building on top of IPFS, and we have a content routing blockstore backed by R2. In other words, we receive user data uploads from our users in a format of blocks of chunked data during their uploads. On the reads, we need to reconstruct the graph of the data they previously uploaded to serve it as the complete file - v
Vonarian
02/22/2023, 5:59 PMHi. Workers are my love. Bye. - d
dave
02/22/2023, 6:48 PMIs there better docs for using HTMLWriter with TypeScript? https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/runtime-apis/html-rewriter/ - k
kian
02/22/2023, 6:48 PMNope but there isn't a whole lot to it either - d
dave
02/22/2023, 6:55 PMso this is what I have atm:Copy codetypescript class ElementHandler { element(element: { tagName: any }) { console.log(`Incoming element: ${element.tagName}`); } } const rewriter = new HTMLRewriter().on('script', new ElementHandler()) const amp_content_value_rewritten = await rewriter.transform(new Response(amp_content.value.toString())); console.debug(await amp_content_value_rewritten.text()); - d
dave
02/22/2023, 6:55 PMIs there an existing class I can use for for
function, so I don't have to define each property myself?element - k
kian
02/22/2023, 6:56 PMelement: Element - d
dave
02/22/2023, 6:56 PMwell then - d
dave
02/22/2023, 6:56 PMthank you - d
dave
02/22/2023, 6:56 PMthat was way easier of an answer than I expected - k
kian
02/22/2023, 6:56 PMHaha - k
kian
02/22/2023, 6:57 PMCopy codets declare interface HTMLRewriterElementContentHandlers { element?(element: Element): void | Promise<void>; comments?(comment: Comment): void | Promise<void>; text?(element: Text): void | Promise<void>; }