This message was deleted.
# _general
s
This message was deleted.
k
It depends 😄
If you have client/server apps which require as low latency as possible, then AVD would probably not be to choice for these kinds of apps. You will then have to determine if you need some kind of hybrid setup, and if you do, then AVD is not going to be "enough".
s
I think ill just miss allot of the Citrix features. But you do have a good point. I assume placing the AVD next to the server in Azure would resolve those latency issues?
k
If you go from Citrix to AVD, I am sure you'll miss the great Citrix features. To some that just doesn't justify staying on Citrix. I have talked to customers where reducing license costs was priority 1, they were ready to sacrifice a lot of great technology and a great a user experience, to save money
💯 1
o
definitely depends. That is a big conversation of all sorts of decision points.
👍 1
s
You still pay for vm machine usage in addition to the roughly $16 per user fee correct? I assume you choose your desired machine types and then get usage costs?
for the citrix on azure
n
sometimes i just want to trash citrix and go pure rdp
k
@Nick Casagrande yeah, I think we have all been down that road. I have been working with RDS for 10 years, it is not without issues :)