This message was deleted.
# citrix-vad
s
This message was deleted.
j
A week of testing and went prod with it in our pooled random W10 MCS environment last week
For context those brokers went from 2305 to 2311, VDAs from 2308 to 2311... so not the largest jump
s
nice nice, a wins a win
m
Running a single DG on 2311 for a few days now. So far no issues. Also put CWA 2311 on the image at the same time. It's not a full prod DG though, so... :)
👍 1
j
Loving the fact that the CVAD API with 2311 is now GA - no more tech preview limits
been putting that through it's paces and it's looking good
s
Working on anything fun @James Kindon ?
j
Killing off anything that is PowerShell snapin based is the plan - bye bye old PowerShell :0 much better flexibility in automation when we achieve it
s
giving me flashbacks from the .kix/cmd to powershell conversion days.
🤮 1
l
@Jon Bucud what industry and quantity of users? I would LOVE to be able to move that fast. Heck, I'd love to get people on board running a CR instead of LTSR.
o
so far so good on 2311 here
j
@langsbr 400 users, law firm
d
been testing solo for about three weeks or whenever it came out and rolled it out to half our machines this week. I may be a bad example because I also migrated and tweaked Citrix policies from onprem to cloud AND updated Fslogix to the latest release with appropiate reg keys in place for identity roaming. Hopefully all good this week then next will out to remaining machines.
I didn't modify any JSON files for BCR but things are still working seemingly
👍 1
m
And the irony of them releasing a CVE for an ADC denial of service which in turn creates a denial of service on their end when their website can't handle the download requests....
😂 1