How to develop a networking habit?
# forum
j
Just read https://www.cybercultural.com/p/readwriteweb-20 written by a well-known tech blogger guy of whose existence I only recently became aware. Has an interesting tidbit about the blogosphere vs. newsletters today: > 90% of the battle with email newsletters is getting readers. Large networks matter in newsletters; moreso than in blogging. When I was a young blogger, I made a name for myself by catching the attention of more experienced bloggers — either by linking to them (which they would see via the trackback system) or by commenting on their blogs. By comparison, it’s difficult to gain the attention of other newsletter writers; not least because linking has gone out of fashion. It's triggered me again to think about how to help my writing reach people who would want to read it. #1111072618708213830 is one approach -- try to get good at the social media game (substack notes in particular), use that to drive yakread signups, and then let yakread help distribute my writing at TFOS (I can give myself free advertising credits there after all, and will probably give myself a boost in the recommendation algorithm too). plus then anyone who comes across TFOS will already have some context on my work. And getting users for yakread is the more important business goal anyway; if some of them happen to get into TFOS also without me having to anything extra, then great. A downside of that approach is that I'm really not a social media person. My irritation with Substack might provide enough fuel for me to be successful with yakstack anyway, but either way I'm still interested in other non-yakstack ways to network.
So the quote above made me wonder if I should just: - continue reading a bunch of stuff on yakread and try to find articles/writers that are relevant to the stuff I write about - continue writing TFOS weekly/periodically, and be sure to link to + discuss those articles - whenever I publish TFOS, make a thread on substack notes/mastodon/bluesky/wherever those other writers happen to be (but not twitter since I don't want to use twitter) and include links + @-mentions for the articles + writers I linked to in my piece
possible downside is it feels a bit spammy -- and it kind of is! -- but I think if the main essay itself is actually relevent, then maybe it'd still work. Makes me think of cold emails: when I do get them (not often), I always look to see if there's "proof-of-work", i.e. specific references to stuff I've written or built or something. But either way, the underlying goal is just to find out how relevant the message is actually going to be for me--if it's relevant, then I don't really care how much time the sender has spent reading my website. anyway nice thing about this approach is that the majority of the work is reading articles and writing articles, not in using social media. social media is just a pinging system, a replacement for the trackback system that the quote mentions (before my time).
Perhaps the key is to put most of your effort into finding other people and interacting with their ideas, and let your own ideas spread as a byproduct of that.
after more thought: current plan is to go for less quantity and more quality with the essays, then just dm/email people who I think might be interested when I publish them. probably will shoot for like one essay a month.
2 Views