Hi guys, does anybody know if this is the latest documentation for integration of payone into spryker? https://documentation.spryker.com/docs/payone-v1-1 it seems a little bit outdated (Pages have been renamed from Checkout to CheckoutPage meanwhile etc) and our developers are facing some issues while integration this into the checkout process.

Good Morning, does somebody knows a way to restrict a user in a more general way? We see, there is a customer access module which can register user permission via plugins. These permissions are then queried when it comes to the specific action on the frontend. This happens via the permissions client. In the templates the specific permission gets queried to hide/show the corresponding part like the “Add to cart” button etc ... But as far as i can see , implementing new restrictions (e.g. for glue) would also mean to introduce new permission checks on each certain resource … What we want to achieve is to protect actions like “Add to cart” etc. in a more centralized way e.g. on the business level to have NO separated logic for Yves and Glue. Are there maybe any other permission mechanisms to hook in? Any ideas? Any similar situations in the past? Thanks a lot!

Hi guys, i found a bug in the module spryker/checkout (>=4.0.0). Usually the method placeOrder returns an object with an invalid value for “is_success”. This will happen when a plugin in the middle of the pre condition stack failed. Here my PR: https://github.com/spryker/spryker/pull/7238

hello. I need to install module from private repository. And I need to add public ssh key to the CLI docker container. How can I do it? How can add this key when entering CLI container using

docker/sdk cli

? thanks.

Guys do you test your functionality before releasing it? Seems no. It is impossible to work with your product! I updated module

spryker/navigation-gui (2.5.0 => 2.6.0)

and now all ZED is broken because you changed

vendor/spryker/navigation-gui/src/Spryker/Zed/NavigationGui/Communication/navigation.xml

and we have error. Please fix this ASAP.

Hi there, according to the spryker/router migration guide at https://documentation.spryker.com/v4/docs/migration-guide-router we should add a

Spryker\Zed\Router\Communication\Plugin\EventDispatcher\RequestAttributesEventDispatcherPlugin

to our

EventDispatcherDependencyProvider

. This Plugin does not exist and it looks like this is causing

\Spryker\Zed\Auth\Communication\Plugin\EventDispatcher\AuthorizationEventDispatcherPlugin::onKernelRequest

to fail with endless redirects. Any chance to provide the plugin source directly until the module is fixed?

Hi all, I want to upgrade Kernel from 3.41.1 to 3.50.0 While looking for changes I found two interesting things : 1. New console command for cache building

ResolvableClassCacheConsole

2. ENV variable SPRYKER_CODE_BUCKET The question is, does this mean that I have to register the new command and create the new ENV variable ? is it mandatory for the app to work? Can someone please elaborate on this ? thanks

Hello guys. Again a problem. Now I can't add product to the cart. I updated module

spryker-shop/cart-page (3.16.0 => 3.18.2)

and I see that you've changed the

\SprykerShop\Yves\CartPage\Controller\CartController::addAction

functionality. You've added this lines

$form = $this->getFactory()->createCartPageFormFactory()->getAddToCartForm()->handleRequest($request);

if (!$form->isSubmitted() || !$form->isValid()) {
    $this->addErrorMessage(static::MESSAGE_FORM_CSRF_VALIDATION_ERROR);

    return $this->redirectResponseInternal(CartControllerProvider::ROUTE_CART);
}

When in goes to

\Symfony\Component\Form\Extension\HttpFoundation\HttpFoundationRequestHandler::handleRequest

it checks if the form name

add_to_cart_form

is present in

\Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\InputBag::$parameters

property. But it doesn't. Therefore method

\Symfony\Component\Form\Form::isSubmitted

always returns

false

and it shows error message. Am I doing smth wrong? Or is it a bug again?

hello, how to pass arguments from subscriber to listener, my code

Subscriber:
$eventCollection->addListenerQueued(ProductEvents::PRODUCT_ABSTRACT_AFTER_CREATE, new KacperListener('my argument'));
Listener:
public function __construct($URL_TO_API) {
        $this->URL_TO_API = $URL_TO_API;
}

give me an error:

Too few arguments to function Pyz\Zed\....\KacperListener::__construct(), 0 passed in

Is there any way to extend the default state machine?

DummyPayment01.xml

i mean. I need to add only few commands to events. I don't need the new OMS

Hello, does somebody knows how to generate a test coverage report from spryker docker/sdk testing? I tried from a fresh b2c-demo

docker/sdk testing codecept -x run -c codeception.functional.yml --coverage

But i always get an error for the PyzTests

file_get_contents(/c3/report/clear): failed to open stream: No such file or directory

I see that some additional spryker modules like the webdriverhelper are hooking in here and do some magic, but it seems that the error occurs before the webdriverhelper can react to anything. The suite.before event is causing the error already on the localserver subscriber … Does anybody has a hint for me? How do you generate coverage reports? Do you and when yes how do you run the spryker pyz tests in general for your CI? Generally I find this topic not too much documented in spryker … Best regards

Hi all, when I run codeception, I get this error

In FactoryResolver.php line 38:

  Spryker Kernel Exception
  Can not resolve ModuleBusinessFactory in Business layer for your module "Module"
  You can fix this by adding the missing Factory to your module.
  E.g. Pyz\Zed\Module\Business\ModuleBusinessFactory

The thing is that this class exists

Pyz\Zed\Module\Business\ModuleBusinessFactory

What am I missing?

Hi, I create my own module (working), add it to composer package, after i install it in different spryker project i got the error:

Zed.CRITICAL: Spryker\Zed\Kernel\ClassResolver\Factory\FactoryNotFoundException - Spryker Kernel Exception
Can not resolve pluginZedFactory in Zed layer for your module "plugin"
You can fix this by adding the missing Factory to your module.
E.g. Pyz\Zed\plugin\Zed\pluginZedFactory

Only one difference is that now plugin goes from vendor folder, and earlier (when create that) goes from Pyc\Zed\ folder how can i fix that

Anybody here with knowledge on the AmazonPay module?

Hi, can anyone tell me how I can use other filter types than range, single-select and multi-select in Zed in the b2b shop? I can see that there are other filter types like price-range, enumeration and rating in the vendor folder and I know that I can overwrite them, but I don't know how to use or select them as filter type for a new filter.

Hi! Is there a way to specify what runs on a "full" data import or is the list from

getImporter()

simply used when running a full import?

@average-branch-45579 Hi, sorry that i contact you this way, we (the segmueller-team) have problems regarding the spryker-eco/computop module with spryker/discount, there should be a support ticket ticket number (0001384) i heard that maybe you are having more infos to this? Is there a way to get access to this ticket?

I got a general question regarding

DependencyProviders

and

Factories

in Spryker: As far as I understood, the idea is that the

DependencyProvider

is responsible for solving dependencies to external modules and injecting them into the

Container

- the idea behind the

Factory

is to 1) actually give access to those external dependencies (through

get*

methods) and 2) create inner-module dependencies through

create*

methods (e.g. creating new instances of business models, or creating plugin hook arrays, etc). As far as I understood, the

DependencyProvider

should not instantiate new inner-module objects (e.g. business models), this is the job of the

Factory

. Is this correct? If yes: We have cases in our project, where the

DependencyProvider

is actually instantiating new business objects (as an example, an array of

PostProcessorHookPlugins

), setting them in the

Container

, and the

Factory

is just grabbing those from the

Container

, instead of creating them himself. This has been done (as far as I can see) because we have integration tests which are overriding the

Container

dependencies through the

DependencyHelper

to change the behaviour of a

Process

(so it overrides the array of

PostProcessorHookPlugins

coming from the

DependencyProvider

inside of the integrationtest). Now my question: From an architectural point of view, is this against the concept behind

DependencyProviders

and

Factories

? Would it be more correct to refactor this, so that the

PostProcessorHookPlugins

actually are instantiated in the

Factory

, and the integration-test is mocking the

Factory

then instead of overriding the dependency?

Hi Guys, i have a small problem in TS. Something is not working as expected... This is just a piece of ts script where the problem is located

async render(): Promise<void> {
        debug(this.stepEngineCode, '...fetchOnLoad');
        const response = await this.ajaxProviderRender.fetch();

        if (!response) {
            return;
        }

        if (this.ajaxContainerRender) {
            this.ajaxContainerRender.innerHTML = response;
            await mount();
            this.stepEngineForm = <HTMLFormElement>this.getElementsByClassName(`${this.jsName}__form`)[0];
//this.stepEngineForm is here undefined -> why?
            this.mapStepEngineFormEvents();
        }
    }

After put the response in container and re-mount the components my selector (this.stepEngineForm .....) just is always

undefined

even if (i checked 1000times) the selector is correct and everything is fine... Due the undefined variable cannot be bind events to the form fetched... This function render just render a form on-load of page... in the case i disable the fetchonLoad, the form is direclty rendered from twig and the same selector present in

readyCallback

function works and the events are properly mapped.. I see that Spryker has in Core a similar case about quick-order-form (

vendor/spryker-shop/quick-order-page/src/SprykerShop/Yves/QuickOrderPage/Theme/default/components/molecules/quick-order-form/quick-order-form.ts:95

) and it works as expected... The code is very similar... but on my script just does not work.. Can anyone maybe help me? Thanks in advance.

vendor/bin/console router:cache:warm-up

☝️ is that new or old? (https://documentation.spryker.com/docs/t-create-table-view)

Hi @loud-rainbow-44827, maybe you're missing the synchronization behavior in your schema.xml? Something like

<behavior name="synchronization">
            <parameter name="resource" value="category_image"/>
            <parameter name="locale" required="true"/>
            <parameter name="key_suffix_column" value="fk_category"/>
            <parameter name="queue_group" value="sync.storage.category"/>
        </behavior>

Hello Spryker community. I faced an issue of broken ES index, after update it with command

search:setup

. Because I've done it on

strage

its acceptable to delete index and create it once more. But this is unacceptable for

prod

. So my questions are: 1. I tried create copy of index with command

search:index:copy

, but get an 400 error. So what the right way of creating copy of existing index? 2. Is there a way, to run commands like

event:trigger

on inactive index? Thanks in advance.

Notice that we get some failed messages in

event.error

containing the following JSON:

"retryMessage": "Retry on: Please enable the event logger in the config_* files to see the error message: `$config[EventConstants::LOGGER_ACTIVE] = true;`",
  "errorMessage": "Please enable the event logger in the config_* files to see the error message: `$config[EventConstants::LOGGER_ACTIVE] = true;`"
}

does this mean that if I active logging, these fields will be filled in? or that it will write to the error log?

👋 should

EventConstnats::ACTIVATE_LOGGING

be enabled on production ?

Hello Spryker community, i’ve a problem in TS with copying a text to clipboard in Safari:

copyTextToClipboard (text: string): boolean {
         const elem = <HTMLTextAreaElement> document.createElement ('textarea');
         elem.value = text;
         document.body.appendChild (elem);
         elem.select ();
         const isCopied = document.execCommand ('copy');
         document.body.removeChild (elem);

         return isCopied;
     }

That works in FireFox and Chrome. In Safari the method document.execCommand (‘copy’) returns false. What could be the problem?

Hello, We are having an unpleasant situation when we synchronize data to Elasticsearch. We are updating a lot of documents. Event processing is fine and generating sync.search.* messages. We use the default  _DEFAULT_SYNC_STORAGE_QUEUE_MESSAGE_CHUNK_SIZE_ which is set to 10000. Elasticsearch is running out of memory and it returns errors. When the bulk writer response has an error, it throws a new BulkResponseException with all the error messages in the message body. The problem occurs when the exception is caught (

\Spryker\Zed\Synchronization\Business\Message\BulkQueueMessageProcessor::runBulkWrite

), it adds the error to all the messages (containing all the errors from the failing messages -

\Spryker\Zed\Synchronization\Business\Message\BulkQueueMessageProcessor::markEachMessageChunkAsFailed

). This will generate messages ~20MB in the error queue (the initial message had ~10KB), consuming a lot of resources (10k messages * 20MB each * number of chunks). What’s the recommended way to solve this issue?

Hello and good morning everyone, I've got a question regarding testing: I want to test some functionality in our payment provider's module. To do so I need to "mock" an order. I've learnt that "Transfers" in the _data directory are meant to solve this problem. My question is: Should I create an "Orer transfer mock" in the payment provider's module or is it a better practice to create the mock in the order module an inject it to the pp-module?

Hello guys. small question about your architecture approach. You declared that we need to use query objects on query containers. But what I see in your data import module that you are using query objects directly in writer steps. For example here

\Pyz\Zed\DataImport\Business\Model\ProductAbstract\ProductAbstractWriterStep

or here

\Pyz\Zed\DataImport\Business\Model\Customer\CustomerWriterStep

. Actually everywhere. Was it any specific reason to do so? Why didn't you inject the appropriate query containers in constructor of writer steps classes? Because I'm implementing import steps for my custom entity and I'm confused with your approach. thanks

@silly-morning-72934 ☝️ ?