Serverless Stack

Any way to do `Api` targets using <https://github.com/aws-samples/serverless-patterns/blob/main/apigw-http-api-eventbridge/api.yaml#L19|aws-proxy> ? so we can directly target services? SNS, EventBridge etc?

Oh I'm looking for the opposite
API -&gt; EventBridge

I believe it's called a “Service Integration” 

<@U01MV4U2EV9> Looks like <https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/issues/10497#issuecomment-760125780|it is possible with L1> ?

Ah api to eventbridge is possible, we don't support it easily yet

<@U01MV4U2EV9> any reason why this would not be somone’s go-to for setting up a webhook -&gt; EventBridge? I figured it could also be done with APIG -&gt; Lambda -&gt; EventBridge.
But I think that is what Service Integrations are for…. to go directly to the service without the lambda middleman.

<https://serverless-stack.slack.com/archives/C01JG3B20RY/p1632361796350300?thread_ts=1632346039.346400&amp;cid=C01JG3B20RY> Do you mean possible with L2 or just with L1 <https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/issues/10497#issuecomment-760125780|like this guy is doing>?

Also, if I stop using SST.Api and use core constructs for that… but I continue to use SST.Function…. do I loose anything local debugging related?

Yeah webhooks are great for a direct integration, I want this myself.  I meant we can wrap that L2 compelxity with a simpler implementation on our end

and sst.Function is a normal lambda.Function so you can pass that anywhere in cdk

yup, it was more about whether I would loose that cool local function debugging / tracing in SST…. is that tied to Function so as long as I use that I’m good, even with other core Constructs?

<@U0262HPPG0Y> yeah we are waiting for CDK to add L2 support for service integrations <https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/pull/16287>

If you decide to give it a crack and wire it up urself using L1 constructs, you can still use `sst.Api`. No need to ditch it, b/c `sst.Api.httpApi` gives u the underlying `apigv2.HttpApi`.

ah… sweet… ya still getting the hang of L2/L1 stuff with CDK

For example:
```const api = new sst.Api(...);
api.httpApi.node.defaultChild &lt;- CfnHttpApi object```

sweeeet…. that would be great cause I REALLY like SST.Api