This message was deleted.

I’ve written just one article using copy.ai. In my opinion, it made my job of structuring the article easier and i got some good headline ideas in an instant. But it then depends on the writer to take it forward from there.

Its better than other AI writers out there

Worked well for me. Good to get started and get some structure.

I recently generated LP copies through Anyword and the quality looked better.

I've used it a couple of times. It's actually made good use of GPT-3 to generate quality copies. Solving the same problem but Made in India is peppertype.ai (@Dhriti Goyal)

Ive used writesonic ans jarvis. Out of the 2, Jarvis is much better (and more expensive) , especially for long form copy. For short form, writesonic does the job for me.

It gives you a very good headstart. I've tried Articleforge too earlier, and in comparison, Copy.ai's first draft way way better and we'll articulated.

My team have been using Closerscopy. Used many different templates; but the feel of AI generated content does fill the reading soul.

I have been lowkey testing copy.ai since it was in beta for various projects. For me (as a writer), its pretty good for fleshing out a rough draft/outline + idea generation + some hero copy here and there. I think at this point it's a great writing aid, not so much of an AI writer (yet). You will still need a fantastic editor to actually get anything usable out of it.

GPT3 based tools are only good to create transactional content. Headlines, meta and product descriptions, etc. They generally lack structure and logical flow. You will ultimately have to rewrite the whole thing.