... still waiting for 0.7.1 support

While talking about 0.7, will this next update (@sorenbs mentioned it would be early this week) add support for Query + Mutation support over WebSocket? I think that would be an important feature, especially on bad connectivity, as REST API sometimes doesn’t get thru as well as WebSocket (in ISPs like in our country (Madagascar))

thanks @eliezedeck for the info. But I think subscription is an overkill in this case, since effectively subscription still requires sending two calls to the server. I guess I am requesting is something like nested queries

(aka query dependency in a single call)

@figo 🙂 sorry, I was simply adding more comments to my previous question

ah my bad - I thought you mentioned query + mutation, which is kind of what I'm looking for 🙂

but for your question, I’m not sure what you’re really after, but dependencies is one of the reason people use GraphQL; it’s just your query: it can pull all dependencies in one single call

@eliezedeck not if you want to do a two dependent mutate in a single call

(create B, then create A-B relationship)

@figo I guess you’ll benefit from the Mutations over WebSocket like I do as well. That would be really cheap. Right now, it’s still over HTTPS, and it is expensive because it has to send everything (Auth tokens, etc...) everytime on each request. To my simple test, my payload is about 4KB, where as the same thing could have been done in just under 250B with WebSocket alone.

so, you also create A, then?

I don’t know if it’s possible to have multiple mutations in one single call, because you obviously need the “id” of the first entity

in my case, A is already created (a registered user)

so A's id is already known

A is creating some TODO task (B). It seems I have to create B, and then connect A with B via relationship, in graph cool way

really? that sounds inefficient ... I’m also a beginner in GraphQL, but I think you should be able to set

ID!

as plain strings in your mutation; these are all JSON in the end anyways

i can give it a try and will let you know

@figo worked for you?

@nilan I haave created one function and in this function i'm calling one webhook from TRANSFORM_PAYLOAD But my webhook not calling Please let me know what would be issue?

This message was deleted.

Hello, someone has a trick to compare an ID and a String in the query permission? I would like to something like

resourceId_in: ["*", $node_id]

where

resourceId

is actually a String

I'm getting a timeout at the moment just creating a record in graphcool. anyone experiencing the same thing?

error message from cloudfront after 60seconds trying to create a record

CloudFront attempted to establish a connection with the origin, but either the attempt failed or the origin closed the connection.

Hi, is there any possibility to attach a function to a query on a type, instead of a mutation?

For a computed column for example?

I'm confused about

updateOrCreate

. Can someone post just a quick example query so I can see how it looks?

Hello, anyone has experience in mapping apollo query results to interfaces?

When using webhooks in functions, is it possible to not display the "node" property by specifiying if it is a "simple/apollo" api?

did the function API change since like 2 weeks ago?

all my server subsriptions seem to be broken now