Charles Gaudreau Jackson
11/26/2021, 8:34 PMRenato Carneiro
11/26/2021, 9:21 PMItalo Gama
11/27/2021, 1:45 AMItalo Gama
11/27/2021, 1:46 AMWingy
11/27/2021, 3:33 AMTaylor Cantwell
11/27/2021, 6:48 AMuser
11/27/2021, 1:22 PMBrook MG
11/27/2021, 3:52 PMCarlos
11/27/2021, 4:26 PMJinho Chung
11/27/2021, 11:38 PMprisma db pull should be evoked followed by prisma generate. Is this a common pattern? Does this suggest that if prisma is being added to an existing database, that migrations should not be used?Vinicius Marchesin
11/27/2021, 11:55 PMmodel Community {
id String @id @unique @default(uuid()) @db.Uuid
regions Region[]
...more stuff here
members UsersOnCommunities[]
}
enum Region {
NA
EU
LATAM
}
model User {
id String @id @unique @default(uuid()) @db.Uuid
...more stuff here
communities UsersOnCommunities[]
}
model UsersOnCommunities {
id String @unique @default(uuid())
userId String @db.Uuid
communityId String @db.Uuid
...more stuff here
community Community @relation(fields: [communityId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade)
user User @relation(fields: [userId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade)
@@id([userId, communityId])
}
I want to find find many communities where region: ['NA'] and the count of members is greater than n . I am using
const data = await prisma.community.findMany({
...my pagination here,
where: {
regions: {
hasSome: regions,
},
},
include: {
_count: {
select: {
members: true,
},
},
},
});
With this I am able to get the count of members, but I can't filter by that. From the docs it looks like I need to use groupBy and filter using having, but how can I get all fields back from the group by that way? Not sure what's the best way to do this besides a raw query.Kunal Shah
11/28/2021, 3:36 AMupdate call
const data = await prisma.document.update({
where: { id },
data: {
...params,
// updated_at: new Date(), // when this is uncommented, type-checking fails
},
});
it correctly highlights that params is not the right type to update the document. However when I uncomment the updated_at line, the errors go away and it fails to typecheck at all. Any idea what I am doing wrong here? thanks in advance!Robert Fish
11/28/2021, 2:06 PMBenny
11/28/2021, 2:46 PMprepare script of one of our libs we want to run prisma migrate dev.
We are getting
Error: Prisma Migrate has detected that the environment is non-interactive, which is not supported
Is there a way to automatically accept the migrations? What is the best practice here?Benny
11/28/2021, 2:51 PMprisma db push --accept-data-loss is the way to go?Benny
11/28/2021, 3:05 PMBenny
11/28/2021, 3:14 PMprisma db push --accept-data-loss in npm prepare script that will apply the changes that were pulled (because when pulling we are running pnpm i that will eventually trigger prepare.)
2. When changing the schema locally, before pushing, we have to run prisma migrate dev to generate migration files.
Is this the correct flow?joao.santos
11/28/2021, 4:05 PMglenn
11/28/2021, 6:38 PMawait prisma.$queryRaw`SELECT * from job_search_db.jobs_function(
${distanceInt},
${dateRangeStr},
${remoteBoolArr},
${citiesArr},
${termsArr},
${excludeTermsArr},
${excludeCompaniesArr},
${jobBoardsArr},
${orderBy},
${limitInt},
${offsetInt}
)`
when I format it like this I get: db error: ERROR: number of array dimensions (1634890337) exceeds the maximum allowed (6)
However, when I just log the query that I placed in a variable then paste the query in hardcoded it works and returns the expected results
const result = await prisma.$queryRaw`SELECT * from job_search_db.jobs_function(
50000,
'2021-09-29T17:24:58.142Z',
array[true, false],
array[4560349,5128581,5205659],
array['%javascript%','%react.js%'],
array['%junior%','%jr%','%manager%','%analyst%','%recruiter%','%accounting%','%network%','%associate%'],
array['cybercoders'],
null,
'desc',
26,
0
)`
I don't really understand whyJulien Demarque
11/29/2021, 11:55 AMuser
11/29/2021, 12:18 PMItalo Gama
11/29/2021, 3:31 PMJames Homer
11/29/2021, 3:39 PMJames Homer
11/29/2021, 3:42 PMChris Bitoy
11/29/2021, 4:12 PMBenny
11/29/2021, 4:41 PMItalo Carrasco
11/29/2021, 6:49 PMmodel Notaria {
idNotaria Int @id @default(autoincrement())
idEstado Int
razonSocial String @db.VarChar(255)
codigo String @db.VarChar(255)
createdAt DateTime @default(now())
updatedAt DateTime @updatedAt
estado Estado @relation(fields: [idEstado], references: [idEstado])
}
model Estado {
idEstado Int @id @default(autoincrement())
nombre String @db.VarChar(255)
Notaria Notaria[]
}
i am trying to use create like this but it throws an error related to data saying: type number is not assignable to undefined
crearNotaria: (_parent: any, args: CreateNotariaInput) => {
return prisma.notaria.create({
data: {
...args,
estado: { connect: { idEstado: args.idEstado } },
},
});
}
if i change the code to this, the error goes away. i dont understand why the first method doesnt work or what am i doing wrong.
crearNotaria: (_parent: any, args: CreateNotariaInput) => {
return prisma.notaria.create({
data: {
...args,
idEstado: args.idEstado,
},
});
}Marcus Y.
11/29/2021, 7:19 PMmodel Newsletter {
email String @unique
}
model User {
id Int @id @unique @default(autoincrement())
config Configuration @relation(fields: [configurationId], references: [id])
records Record[]
information Information @relation(fields: [informationId], references: [dbid])
informationId String
affirmations String?
configurationId String
recaps Recap[]
lastIndex Int?
}
I create a new Newsletter record by running:
return await server.db.newsletter.create({
data: {
email: args.email,
},
});
It returns:
PrismaClientKnownRequestError:
`Invalid prisma.newsletter.findFirst() invocation:`
`Failed to validate the query: Field does not exist on enclosing type. at `Query.findFirstNewsletter``
at cb (/Users/*/*/*/*/node_modules/@prisma/client/runtime/index.js:38675:17)
at Object.addEmailToNewsletter (/Users/*/*/*/*/src/resolvers/addEmailtoNewsletter.ts:7:16) {
code: 'P2009',
clientVersion: '3.5.0',
meta: {
query_validation_error: 'Field does not exist on enclosing type.',
query_position: 'Query.findFirstNewsletter'
}
}
Any idea how to resolve this?Zak
11/29/2021, 9:24 PMMichael Aubry
11/29/2021, 9:44 PMid String @id @default(cuid())
Then the column is forced to 25 chars, but the docs say it can be up to 30, and I am running into a column too large issue. What is the best way to update the column char count to 30? Why did it generate at 25?
id character(25) PRIMARY KEY,
-- DDL generated by Postico 1.5.19
-- Not all database features are supported. Do not use for backup.
-- Table Definition ----------------------------------------------
CREATE TABLE graphcool."Media" (
id character(25) PRIMARY KEY,
createdat timestamp with time zone NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
updatedat timestamp with time zone NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
date timestamp with time zone,
duration double precision,
loading boolean NOT NULL,
mediaurl text,
name text,
thumbnails text,
trimmed boolean,
type text,
uid text,
"thumbnailSprites" text,
metadata text
);
-- Indices -------------------------------------------------------
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_17956_primary ON graphcool."Media"(id bpchar_ops);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_17956_id_unique ON graphcool."Media"(id bpchar_ops);