This message was deleted.

ah. this looks like a bug. let me try to reproduce it

ahh i think its a name cycle

ok

before you do anything let me dig in a little

ok cool

I had

test-grid-

and then created another task

test-grid-downstream

ah yes. that will fail since it cannot resolve as a DAG

I'm curious though. There isn't a way to use the same grid across multiple tasks

re multiple tasks: is this what you're looking for? https://github.com/ploomber/ploomber/issues/602

could I make the names

test_grid-[[param]]

re grid parameters in the name: not yet

yup exactly that

could I make the names

test_grid-[[param]]

there's also an open issue about this 😅

ok cool

keep an eye on this: https://github.com/ploomber/ploomber/issues/698

since parameters could subtly change the output and downstream tasks may have behavior dependent on parameter values

task execution order?

i.e. if I pass

train

,

eval

to the grid is the task-0 always associated with

train

interesting question. i never thought about it. i took a quick glance at the source code. I think it should be since we generate the grid by iterating over the dictionary of parameters and beginning in Pytyhon 3. 6 (I think) dicts iterate in order

yea all good. at least the name in the outputs helps

please keep the feedback coming, it allows us to prioritize what to work on. otherwise we have to guess what's useful for our community