Hi - I am having some trouble removing a pact integration; any help would be welcome!

how should one read this

swagger-mock-validator

output? What confuses me is comparison of mock response body to

value: [ [Object], [Object] ]

. It's not clear what is incompatible. I've omitted a bunch of fields in the mock for brevity.

1 error(s)
	response.body.incompatible: 1
0 warning(s)
{
  warnings: [],
  errors: [
    {
      code: 'response.body.incompatible',
      message: 'Response body is incompatible with the response body schema in the spec file: should match exactly one schema in oneOf',
      mockDetails: {
        interactionDescription: '6cee5dad-fe47-4ab7-9384-d53d5260427a',
        interactionState: '[none]',
        location: '[root].interactions[27].response.body',
        mockFile: './msw_generated_pacts/dashboard-web-api-1675179158185.json',
        value: {
          createdAt: '2022-10-30T00:00:00Z',
          "...": "...",
          status: 'DRAFT',
        }
      },
      source: 'spec-mock-validation',
      specDetails: {
        location: '[root].paths./api/invoices/{id}/payment-status.put.responses.200.content.application/json.schema.oneOf',
        pathMethod: 'put',
        pathName: '/api/invoices/{id}/payment-status',
        specFile: 'dereferencedSchema.json',
        value: [ [Object], [Object] ]
      },
      type: 'error'
    }
  ]
}

Hello, I'm testing a pact against an open api specification, when my 3rd pact interaction is incompatible with the OAS, all my interactions are marked as failed

Hi all! I'm have some confusing (to me) information in pactflow/can-i-deploy. can-i-deploy is failing with a "There is no verified pact between version ..... and the version of thing-model-service currently in Dev....." but when I go to the matrix tab it shows a status of "Verified". What am I missing or doing wrong? 😅

Hi folks, Regarding bi-directional verification, where the Contract Verification Status is Compatible (On the "View Contract" page, but in the Overview page I see the integration status as Unknown, not Success as it happens when a consumer-driven integration is verified. When I run can-i-deploy, it says that there is no verification results for this integration. Is this expected? Am I misinterpreting something here?

Hey guys, we are having a look into stubbing and found the pact-stub-server that is provided by the pact foundation. The docker image gives the option to provide a header to select provider-states and get an answer based on that. We wondered whether there is an option to use this against the Pactflow instance as well. Do you have a default header that we can set to use the stubbing service of PactFlow to select the response based on a provider state, or is this not possible at all? Kind regards, Werner

Pipelines for both our products (API & Dashboard) are now fully integrated with Pactflow bi-directional contract testing 🚀 I will continue keeping an eye on channels here for updates & provide feedback as it arrives 🙂

Hi Pact gurus, Currently we are working on BDCT and trying to publish our contract to Pactflow. I am using Docker commands but a bit confused with the doc examples and the command helper. What I am trying to do is to manually upload the contract to test the integrations on the CI pipeline, with the minimum command arguments and configurations. But I am getting the errors

Error making request to https://{PACTFLOW_HOST} status=400 {"errors":{"verificationResults.success":["success is missing"],"verificationResults.content":["content is missing"],"verificationResults.contentType":["contentType is missing"]}}

. So obviously, some of the params are mandatory that I missed, but the doc didn't clearly say which ones are and I am trying to figure it out. The followings are the references and the examples I am following, with my scripts

getting 502 from pactflow when running can-i-deploy 😕

ERROR: Error making request - Net::ReadTimeout Net::ReadTimeout with #<TCPSocket:(closed)> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/3.0.0/gems/pact_broker-client-1.66.0/lib/pact_broker/client/hal/http_client.rb:80:in `block (2 levels) in perform_request', attempt 1 of 5
ERROR: Error making request - Net::ReadTimeout Net::ReadTimeout with #<TCPSocket:(closed)> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/3.0.0/gems/pact_broker-client-1.66.0/lib/pact_broker/client/hal/http_client.rb:80:in `block (2 levels) in perform_request', attempt 2 of 5
ERROR: Error making request - Net::ReadTimeout Net::ReadTimeout with #<TCPSocket:(closed)> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/3.0.0/gems/pact_broker-client-1.66.0/lib/pact_broker/client/hal/http_client.rb:80:in `block (2 levels) in perform_request', attempt 4 of 5
Error retrieving matrix. PactBroker::Client::Hal::ErrorResponseReturned - Error making request to ***/matrix status=502 <html>
<head><title>502 Bad Gateway</title></head>
<body>
<center><h1>502 Bad Gateway</h1></center>
</body>

Hi Community, I have a question about BDCT. On Consumer side we have an iOS app implementing traditional PACT. On our provider side, we have OAS available and we think that we could generate the PACT file by implement BCDT using RestAssured. Is this compatible? In the documentation we saw: Compatible with Consumers This project is currently compatible with the following consumers(s): • pactflow-example-bi-directional-consumer-nock • pactflow-example-bi-directional-consumer-msw • pactflow-example-bi-directional-consumer-wiremock • pactflow-example-bi-directional-consumer-mountebank Does it mean Bidirectional feature is not compatible with PACT contracts?

Hey team, this is tommy from culture amp. I seem to get a ssl issue. Here is the thread where I initially asked the question https://pact-foundation.slack.com/archives/C9VPNUJR2/p1675989683954029

Hi pact team, i'm trying to access the subscription portal in pactflow but I have not received a one time password and have requested again but nothing has come in for a while.

Is there a required workflow order needed in order to tell the broker that contracts should exist? I'm attempting to spin up some provider tests but

pact-provider-verifier

keeps returning with something similar to the following: (organization and project have been masked)

/usr/lib/ruby/gems/3.1.0/gems/pact-1.63.0/lib/pact/hal/entity.rb:102:in 'assert_success!': Error retrieving https://${organization}.<http://pactflow.io/pacts/provider/${project}-provider-golang/for-verification|pactflow.io/pacts/provider/${project}-provider-golang/for-verification> status=404 {"error":"The requested document was not found on this server."} (Pact::hal::ErrorResponseReturned)

@Tomer Ghelber has left the channel

In Pactflow, I am getting a Validator Error due to my provider contract specifying "items": { "type": "number", "format": "int32" }. This seems to also break the consumer tests in a way that they all give false positives. I don't see anything offspec with our implementation but if I remove the "format": "int32" from my property the consumer contract properly validates with confirmed errors. Is there a known bug related to specifying format in a property in the provider contract?

Hello, I encountered the following error. The producer specifies an API path similar to

GET /users/{user_id}/settings

{user_id}

is defined as

string

with a regex to validate the format in detail (int, uuid or other formats). The consumer calls the API with

GET /users/1234/settings

and the pact check fails with

"No request method is found /users/1234/settings" => "Path or method not defined in spec file: GET /users/1234/settings"

. When I remove the regex check from the producer OAS file, then the pact check works.

Hi there, does anyone have a pactflow example of a ruby provider verification? I'm not sure how to set up the pact_broker_client task if im using pactflow

require 'pact/provider/rspec'

require "./spec/pact/provider_states_for_order_item_categories"

Pact.service_provider "monolith" do
  honours_pact_with 'testDemo_platform_payment_service' do
    pact_broker_base_url = ''
    pact_broker_client = PactBroker::Client.new(base_url: pact_broker_base_url)
    pact_url = pact_broker_client.pact_url('monolith', 'testDemo_platform_payment_service')
    pact_uri pact_url
    publish_verification_results true
    enable_pending true 
    include_wip_pacts_since "2020-01-01"
  end
end

Hello! 👋 I posted this question in #C9VBGLUM9 but as I dig in more, I feel that as per this article, my implementation should have worked. Hence, X-posting it here to see if I can get some help with PactFlow as my pact broker?

Hi there i'm using pactflow on a provider ruby on rails application and on the verification step i am getting a 401 unauthorized error. See error below:

Error retrieving <https://applyboard>.<name>.io status=401 Unauthorized. Please see <https://docs.pactflow.io/docs/login-help> for more information. (Pact::Error)

I have already followed the steps outlined here: https://docs.pactflow.io/docs/login-help/#getting-a-401-unauthorized-when-publishing-or-verifying-pacts Package should be up to date, i'm using pact gem version 1.32. Using the read/write token from pactflow. And I followed the provider code in pact_helper.spec here: https://docs.pactflow.io/#configuring-your-api-token

Hi, engineering teams at my company are using the https://github.com/pact-foundation/pact-ruby-cli (via its Docker image https://hub.docker.com/r/pactfoundation/pact-cli) for publishing pacts to PactFlow. However, a recent internal security audit flagged 10+ high or critical security vulnerabilities as part of the latest tag i.e.

pactfoundation/pact-cli:0.51.0.0

. The audit was done by running the Trivy security scanner and result can be easily reproduced locally. As the latest tag is published 3 months ago, I'm wondering if there is a plan to release a newer image to patch those vulnerabilities?

Hi there, are there any examples of how to set up a sign_in with device with pact ruby? Trying to use sign in but I think because pact is not of type request then it does not work. In the rails_helper we have this line that is needed, i've tried using type to be pact but still no luck.

config.include Devise::Test::IntegrationHelpers, type: :request

This is the code I have atm:

require "rails_helper"

Pact.provider_states_for "testDemo_platform_payment_service" do
  provider_state "Order items exist" do
    set_up do
      user = User.create!(
        username: "admin1",
        email: "<mailto:example@applyboard.net|example@applyboard.net>",
        role: "admin",
        password: "example",
        password_setup: true,
        blocked: false,
        has_accepted_terms: false,
        has_accepted_privacy: false,
      )
      sign_in user
    end
  end
end

Hello! We are using pacflow.io to house all of our consumer and provider contracts and we are seeing a really strange issue. The issue is we have an interaction listed as

???

and we can't click into it to delete it or anything (see image below). When we do we get a blank screen. Is there a way to delete this via api or otherwise? We'd really like to remove this from our dashboard. Thank you so much.

Hello, I encountered a response-body validation error. The server/producer defines the "400 Bad Request" response body as follows:

responses:
  error-400-bad-request:
    description: ''
    content:
      application/vnd.api+json:
        schema:
          type: object
          properties:
            errors:
              type: array
              items:
                type: object
                properties:
                  source:
                    type: object
                    properties:
                      parameter:
                        type: string
                      pointer:
                        type: string
                  code:
                    type: string
                    enum:
                      - BAD_REQUEST
                      - UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY
                  status:
                    type: string
                    enum:
                      - '400'
                      - '422'
                  details:
                    type: string
                required:
                  - code
                  - status
          required:
            - errors
        examples:
          Example 1:
            value:
              errors:
                - source:
                    parameter: id
                  detail: is in invalid format
                  code: BAD_REQUEST
                  status: '400'

Example:

{
  "errors": [
    {
      "source": {
        "parameter": "id"
      },
      "detail": "is in invalid format",
      "code": "BAD_REQUEST",
      "status": "400"
    }
  ]
}

The client/consumer used the following mocked response body:

{
  errors: [
    {
      status: "400",
      code:   "INVALID_QUERY_PARAMETER",
      source: {
        params: "foobar"
      }
    }
  ]
}

It expected the undefined

params

instead of

parameters

, but pactflow didn't detect an error.

Hello, I have a provider which get verified against multiple consumers using the traditional way, a new API request has been added to represent a new consumer can I use Bi-directional contract testing for the newly developed API requests only?

Hiya folks 👋 I looking for some help with the webhooks in PactFlow. The issue I am facing is that

contract_requiring_verification_published

is being fired even when there is no change in the contract from last “latest” published contract

Hey everyone, Is it possible to get API tokens of some other user through API or TF having sufficient permissions? I couldn't find it in the documentation.

Hello 👋 Is there a ruby example for bi-directional contract testing?

Do you use AsyncAPI in your organisation? Would you like to be involved at an early stage, in the design of support for AsyncAPI as part of PactFlow's Bi-Directional contract testing offering? If so, please drop us an blob wave, a reply in a thread 🧵 , or join our Developer Preview Programme 🦜

Hi All. Why does my provider's can-i-deploy step say successful when the status of the broker is 'Unknown' awaiting the consumer contract to be generated and published to the broker? The provider side is uploading an openapi spec and newman verification results. In this scenario the consumer contract is invalid so should break my pipeline but its passing way before then. If I rerun this can i deploy step after the consumer has published and the status is failed in the broker, the can I deploy steps works as expected. Any ideas?

hello - i need some assistance with pactflow. We're introducing a new integration and the provider main branch cannot detect any

for-verification

pacts, however we have a pending pact to be verified on a feature branch for both the consumer and provider.