Yauheni Butski
10/14/2024, 1:48 PMYauheni Butski
10/14/2024, 1:55 PMMurat Ozcan
10/16/2024, 4:15 PMLuis Nuño
10/17/2024, 5:44 PMCannot read properties of undefined (reading 'type')
There was nothing else than that, no further details, nothing that could point us to the cause of the error or where to find it, and after the error all tests were marked as passed.
After several days we finally found the cause of the problem, a typo in a parameter's name in the OAS, yes it was a dumb issue, but hard to find in an OAS with 3k+ lines.
After fixing the param name, the error was not displayed anymore, but additional and more specific validation errors appeared, this time related to some of our tests, such as datatypes mismatches, missing body attributes, etc, errors that were easily fixed but that were originally masked/hidden by the "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'type')" error.
Now, we are working on a new Bi-Directional Contract Testing project and this time we started with a single test on the consumer side and with a simple OAS with only 5 endpoints, we published the contract and the spec file to PactFlow and one more time we have a Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'type')
validation error.
We carefully checked the OAS and this time we have no typos or param issues and we have no idea of what may be causing this error.
We have searched information about this error and it looks like it is very generic, it is displayed under many different circumstances.
We are stuck and we have no clue on what may be causing the issue this time, so I would really appreciate if you have any suggestion/input/tip on where/what to check.Oleksandr Yanov
10/18/2024, 1:49 PMShubham Sharma
10/27/2024, 2:25 PMThiago Morato
10/30/2024, 7:42 PMSiim Mardus
11/01/2024, 8:48 AMeachValueMatches
or eachKeyMatches
for either-or, but I am unsure how could I chain/combine them.Александр Чепрасов
11/01/2024, 11:40 AMmockService.url
into it?Александр Чепрасов
11/01/2024, 1:31 PMrecord-deployment
.
What I want to do:
1. Write a test for the consumer.
2. Publish it to the Pact broker.
Next, I need to check if I can publish the consumer. To do this, I should use can-i-deploy
. If can-i-deploy
passes successfully, then I can deploy my branch to production. Is that correct?
What's the purpose of record-deployment
? And why do we need things like --environment test
Nikita Sushkov
11/02/2024, 7:50 AMpact-broker publish --consumer-app-version=<<SHA goes here>> ...
command to publish the contract
2. Using the Webhook and passing the variable pactbroker.consumerVersionNumber from here https://github.com/pact-foundation/pact_broker/blob/master/lib/pact_broker/doc/views/webhooks.markdown#dynamic-variable-substitution
3. Retrieving the PACT using the Verifier from @pact-foundation/pact
So, I'm stuck at the first step, because I do not see any verifier option that I can use to fetch the PACT by the consumer version (neither top level parameters nor consumerVersionSelectors). So, my question is it possible to do in the first place? In the answer is no what is the recommended process here? In this scenario I'm trying to verify a consumer branch which is not yet published as a part of the healthy branch pattern. ThanksJulie Laursen
11/04/2024, 10:44 PMAsk and you shall receive v7.3.0 on the way out that both allows a dynamic port (see e2e and typescript examples) and will return the full complement of Pact options from setup().
Do I need to specifically call PactV3 to get dynamic ports? I have a config file:
import {
HttpLink,
InMemoryCache,
ApolloClient,
NormalizedCacheObject,
} from '@apollo/client';
import { PactTestServerConfig } from '@/utils/pact-constants';
import fetch from 'cross-fetch';
let client: ApolloClient<NormalizedCacheObject>;
global.fetch = fetch;
export const setupPactTests = () => {
const client = new ApolloClient({
cache: new InMemoryCache({ addTypename: false }),
link: new HttpLink({
uri: `<http://127.0.0.1>:${PactTestServerConfig.Port}/graphql`,
fetch,
}),
});
return client;
};
export function getApolloClient(): ApolloClient<NormalizedCacheObject> {
if (!client) {
client = setupPactTests();
}
return client;
}
I see a lot of examples in java but not js. I'm still new to playing around with env vars and its a weak pointАлександр Чепрасов
11/05/2024, 1:22 PMcan-i-merge
6) get the result "Computer says no ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯"
Why is this the result? I expected a positive result.Lachlan Newman
11/05/2024, 10:26 PMType mismatch: Expected '{"contractVersion":2,"status":{"code":"STUDY_NOT_APPLICABLE","text":"Study processing failed during looking up raw results"},"fhirJson":null,"study":{"uid":"65f4205422a8e1c5282a10278d82baf7aa692da6cd2f4474a1a591d491e14800","artifacts":[{"name":"Annalise-ctc-d6f80baf-c696-4e57-95db-43e0fe0b7a3d.log","documentType":"text/log","groupCode":"annalise-ctc-log","trackingUIDs":["262d7217-0f85-4b64-aebf-1bbaa6759701"]}],"series":null}}' (String) to be the same type as {"contractVersion":101,"fhirJson":null,"status":{"code":"some string","text":"some string"},"study":{"artifacts":[{"documentType":"some string","groupCode":"some string","name":"some string","trackingUIDs":["some string"]}],"series":null,"uid":"some string"}} (Object)
Daniel Barbu
11/06/2024, 4:02 PMSyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module
4 |
5 | const nock = require('nock');
> 6 | const PactV3 = require('../../../node_modules/@pact-foundation/pact')
● Test suite failed to run
Jest encountered an unexpected token
Jest failed to parse a file. This happens e.g. when your code or its dependencies use non-standard JavaScript syntax, or when Jest is not configured to support such syntax.
Out of the box Jest supports Babel, which will be used to transform your files into valid JS based on your Babel configuration.
By default "node_modules" folder is ignored by transformers.
Here's what you can do:
• If you are trying to use ECMAScript Modules, see <https://jestjs.io/docs/ecmascript-modules> for how to enable it.
• If you are trying to use TypeScript, see <https://jestjs.io/docs/getting-started#using-typescript>
• To have some of your "node_modules" files transformed, you can specify a custom "transformIgnorePatterns" in your config.
• If you need a custom transformation specify a "transform" option in your config.
• If you simply want to mock your non-JS modules (e.g. binary assets) you can stub them out with the "moduleNameMapper" config option.
You'll find more details and examples of these config options in the docs:
<https://jestjs.io/docs/configuration>
For information about custom transformations, see:
<https://jestjs.io/docs/code-transformation>
Details:
C:\Users\DanielB\source\repos\Core.Website.v2\node_modules\@pact-foundation\pact\node_modules\axios\index.js:1
({"Object.<anonymous>":function(module,exports,require,_dirname,_filename,jest){import axios from './lib/axios.js';
^^^^^^
The test file does not contain much else except the these lines. I will appreciate any hints as to how to approach this problem.John Nguyen
11/11/2024, 8:33 PMpact-js
, jest-pact
, and SuperTest
. I've got a simple consumer test written up, but at the verification stage I get an output that:
Pact between Jest-Consumer-Example and Provider
with 30000 ms timeout for Pact
Pact verification failed - expected interactions did not match actual.
with no additional information. Setting the logLevel in the configuration step to debug
or trace
doesn't give any useful information, and I can't find any log file saved elsewhere.
I've verified through debugging that my API call does return the expected response at the point of calling the API, so I was hoping for advice on how I can get Pact to output more useful information (e.g. a comparison of what was expected vs what was received) about where I've gone wrong. Or if I may have made any obvious implementation mistakes. Thanks in advance, and please let me know what additional information might be useful!
const url = '/path/to/endpoint'
pactWith(
{
consumer: "Jest-Consumer-Example",
provider: "Provider",
logLevel: LOG_LEVEL as LogLevel,
pactfileWriteMode: 'merge',
},
(provider) => {
describe('The API', () => {
const itemExample = {
"NumberField": 3,
}
const EXPECTED_BODY = {
results: eachLike(itemExample)
}
const itemSuccessResponse = {
status: 200,
body: EXPECTED_BODY,
}
const itemRequest = {
uponReceiving: 'a request for a thing',
withRequest: {
method: 'GET' as HTTPMethods,
path: url,
}
}
let agent: SuperAgentTest
beforeEach(async () => {
agent = await AuthHelper.createAgent()
const interaction: InteractionObject = {
state: 'I have a thing',
...itemRequest,
willRespondWith: itemSuccessResponse,
}
return provider.addInteraction(interaction)
})
it('returns a successful body', () => {
return agent.get(`${endpointPath}`)
.then((item) => {
console.log(item)
})
})
})
}
)
Damien Deloubes
11/18/2024, 10:44 PMmake ci PACT_BROKER_BASE_URL="..." PACT_BROKER_TOKEN="..." PACT_PROVIDER="..."
I get the following error:
Specified pact file 'pacts' does not exist. This sometimes indicates one of the arguments has been specified with the wrong name and has been incorrectly identified as a file path. If you are using Docker, check that you have mounted the pact file or directory into the container correctly using
-v`, and have specified the location of the pact file or directory in the Docker container, not the host.`
make: *** [publish_pacts] Error 1
Has anyone encountered the same issue? I am still trying to wrap my head around it all and would love to learn from you all!Andrei Enache
11/27/2024, 10:30 AMContent-Type: application/x-ndjson
header in the response. However, after adding this header in the willRespondWith
section, the response body format seems to be affected. We're seeing additional values like {\"value\":
, { \"value\": {}, \"pact:matcher:type\": \"type\" }
, and others being included in the response. It looks like the matchers might be influencing the JSON serialization when the Content-Type
is set to application/x-ndjson
. For application/json
, everything works as expected.
Could we get some help resolving this? Thanks!James P
11/28/2024, 3:53 PMMatchersV3
and has a property spec: 3
but when the test runs, the pact file specifies version 2. I’ve tried changing to use Matchers
but there is a eachLike
function which has different behaviour - on MatchersV3
it will allow 0 but on Matchers
is wont. So I have 2 questions:
1. Why is the specification coming out as Version 2 when I specify 3?
2. Why has the eachLike behaviour changed so that 0 is no longer a valid case?Val Kolovos
12/04/2024, 8:22 PMMatt (pactflow.io / pact-js / pact-go)
Yalim Yasaroglu
12/12/2024, 2:05 PMbody-parser
middleware, which has a default size limit of ~100KB.
Does anyone know if there’s a way to increase this limit or configure the verifier to handle larger payloads? Or am I missing something in the setup?
Any advice would be much appreciated! 🙏
Thanks!Jeu Manzo
12/16/2024, 11:03 PMClient error: 403 Forbidden Failed to create session
I have set the env variables, and even get the following output when running pactflow-ai status
Luis Nuño
12/23/2024, 9:14 PM15:08:15 [15:08:15.632] DEBUG (676): pact@13.2.0: mock service started on port: 8081
15:08:45 [15:08:45.635] ERROR (677): pact@13.2.0: The pact mock service doesn't appear to be running
15:08:45 - Please check the logs above to ensure that there are no pact service startup failures
15:08:45 - Please check that pact lifecycle methods are called in the correct order (setup() needs to be called before this method)
15:08:45 - Please check that your test code waits for the promises returned from lifecycle methods to complete before calling the next one
15:08:45 - To learn more about what is happening during your pact run, try setting logLevel: 'DEBUG'
We tried changing the port but it doesn't matter which port we use we always get the same error.
I also tried to run the tests locally and I also get the exact same errors, which is also weird since everything was working fine last week 🤔
Do you know what may be causing this error?Dmitry Munda
01/02/2025, 3:07 PM"@pact-foundation/pact": "13.2.0",
Abubakar Mehmood
01/06/2025, 4:08 PMthen
handler is never called. Similarly, if there's an error (e.g. I remove the broker token from the environment variables), the error
handler is never called.
Also, the finally
callback is never called in either case.
Here's my code.
pact.publishPacts(opts)
.then(function() {
console.log(`Published pact successfully. It should be updated on ${brokerUrl}.`);
})
.catch(function(err) {
console.error('Failed to publish pact:', err);
})
.finally(function() {
console.log('i am in finally');
});
I only see the following log messages:
[16:06:01.224] INFO (89029): pact-node@10.18.0: Publishing Pacts to Broker
[16:06:01.225] INFO (89029): pact-node@10.18.0: Publishing pacts to broker at: https://*****.<http://pactflow.io|pactflow.io>
Is this a known issue or am I doing something completely wrong?
(The reason for publishing in JS is that the logic of publishing the pact conditionally, and applying the right tags etc. is more readable and testable)Hernan Mateika
01/15/2025, 3:40 PMpact-js
(Using PactV4) with jest and i am having some issues when creating the contract since I have consumer tests splitted in diferent files and pact json file doesnt display all interactions, just the latest one.
is there any config that i am missing?
I have found some references to this but it seems its not there anymore.
https://github.com/pact-foundation/docs.pact.io/issues/155#:~:text=https%3A//docs.pact.io/implementati[…]litting%2Dtests%2Dacross%2Dmultiple%2DfilesVal Kolovos
02/06/2025, 7:58 PMBas Dijkstra
02/11/2025, 9:19 AMnode_modules
• Checking if there's something running on port 4010
- there isn't, or at least netstat
doesn't show it
Any ideas? I've attached the debug Pact log from their machine for more info.Spencer
02/11/2025, 3:34 PM