<@U0BME18CF7S> please review <https://github.com/O...
# automations-debug
c
@fresh-machine-37269 please review https://github.com/OpenHands/automation/pull/564 and 563, and feel free to approve if you see no major issues, or request changes otherwise. in this order, so that the first solves the thing of the second.
👀 1
f
🤖 On it! View progress here: oss-agent-canvas.ngrok.dev/conversations/…
Reviewed both, in the order you asked. #564 (exclude
.pr/
from lint) — ✅ approved. Two-line config change, low risk, matches the documented
.pr/
convention. Verified on its head: the pre-commit hooks now skip the evidence script,
ruff check .
passes,
ruff format --check .
is clean, and no
.pr/
file is picked up. Without it, the required
backend
job reproduces #563's exact failure. #563 (re-export on key change) — 👍 *no code changes requested*; the fix is correct (I ran the suite: 96 passed, including all four new re-export cases). The only thing keeping it red is the same
backend
check that #564 fixes. I deliberately did not submit a formal approval yet: approving triggers the PR Artifacts cleanup, which would delete the
.pr/
evidence before #564 lands. So the sequence is: merge #564, merge
main
into #563, then the check goes green with the evidence intact — I'll approve it then. This review was posted by an AI agent (OpenHands).
✅ Done! Done — reviewed both, in the order you asked. #564 (exclude
.pr/
from lint)
— ✅ approved. Two-line config change, low risk, matches the documented
.pr/
convention. I verified on its head that the pre-commit hooks now skip the evidence script,
ruff check .
passes,
ruff format --check .
is clean, and no
.pr/
file is picked up. Without it, the required
backend
job reproduces #563's exact failure. #563 (re-export on key change) — 👍 *no code changes requested*; the fix is correct (I ran the suite: 96 passed, including all four new re-export cases). The only thing keeping it red is the same
backend
check #564 fixes. I deliberately did not submit a formal approval yet: approving triggers the PR Artifacts cleanup, which would delete the
.pr/
evidence before #564 lands. So the sequence is: merge #564, merge
main
into #563, then the check goes green with the evidence intact — I'll approve it then.
c
@fresh-machine-37269 thanks, please check 563 again, I merged the other and updated from main, so it should work now for the backend red.
👀 1
f
Checked #563 again at the merge head — the backend red is gone. ✅ Approved, and all required checks (
backend
,
unit-tests
, build) are now green with
mergeStateStatus: CLEAN
. The fix is byte-for-byte what I reviewed before: the merge only pulled in #564's config change, so
openhands/
,
tests/
and
AGENTS.md
are untouched. Re-ran the suite on the new head — 96 passed, all four re-export cases included. One heads-up: approving triggered the PR Artifacts cleanup, which removed
.pr/
from the branch (that's the normal automated behaviour on approval — the workflow isn't scoped to #564's paths). The fix is unaffected; the before/after evidence is still reachable via the commit-pinned link in the PR description (commit
7173546
). So #563 is ready to merge whenever you are.
✅ Done! Checked #563 again at the merge head — the backend red is gone. ✅ Approved. All required checks (
backend
,
unit-tests
, build) are green with
mergeStateStatus: CLEAN
. The fix is byte-for-byte what I reviewed before — the merge only pulled in #564's config change, so
openhands/
,
tests/
and
AGENTS.md
are untouched — and I re-ran the suite on the new head: 96 passed, all four re-export cases included. One heads-up: approving triggered the PR Artifacts cleanup, which removed
.pr/
from the branch (normal automated behavior on approval — the workflow isn't scoped to #564's paths). The fix is unaffected, and the before/after evidence is still reachable via the commit-pinned link in the PR description (commit
7173546
). So #563 is ready to merge whenever you are.