Final summary: • Reviewed the open Dependabot PRs in

OpenHands/OpenHands

that were GitHub-related and single-dependency updates. • Checked upstream release recency for each against the 14-day rule. • Left #13961 alone because the latest

docker/build-push-action

release was too recent. • Verified CI and workflow usage for the older candidates. • Submitted AI-disclosed approval reviews where needed. • Merged the safe PRs: ◦ #13959

docker/metadata-action

→ merged ◦ #13700

actions/download-artifact

→ merged ◦ #13960

docker/login-action

→ merged Conciseness: • No repository code changes were made. • No extraneous local changes were introduced or needed to be reverted. New changes since the last summary: • None. The work is already complete; this message is just the final restatement.

Final update since my last summary: • I did the requested second pass on open Dependabot PRs related to GitHub Actions. • I verified there are no additional grouped or otherwise excluded open

github_actions

Dependabot PRs remaining. • The only open GitHub Actions Dependabot PR still left is #13961: https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13961 • I left #13961 untouched because its upstream package (

docker/build-push-action

) has a latest release date of 2026-04-10, which is still within the 14-day freshness window under your rule. • No further approvals or merges were performed in this second pass. Conciseness: • No extraneous changes were made in this second pass. • No repo code was modified locally; only GitHub PR triage/review actions had been taken earlier.

Since my last summary, I did a deeper security-focused review of PR #13961 (

docker/build-push-action

6 → 7) and did not make any new changes. Summary of new work • Reviewed #13961 specifically for supply-chain risk. • Confirmed the PR only updates three

docker/build-push-action

references in

.github/workflows/ghcr-build.yml

. • Reconfirmed that the relevant Docker CI jobs passed, so the updated action path was actually exercised. • Verified upstream: ◦ official repo:

docker/build-push-action

◦ latest relevant release: v7.1.0 ◦ release author: crazy-max ◦ underlying release commit is GitHub-verified • Reviewed upstream release diffs: ◦

v6.19.2 -> v7.0.0

◦

v7.0.0 -> v7.1.0

• Performed a stronger provenance check by rebuilding upstream v7.1.0 from source and confirming the repo stayed clean after build, which supports that committed

dist/

matches source + lockfile. • Evaluated whether OpenHands uses the newer/riskier code paths; it appears not to rely on the new git-context-query behavior added upstream. Final answer • The request to inspect #13961 carefully and verify upstream from a security / supply-chain perspective was addressed. • No repository code changes were made in this latest step. • No extraneous changes were introduced. Recommendation I found no concrete red flags suggesting upstream compromise in

docker/build-push-action@v7.1.0

. However: • I would still leave #13961 open for now if we continue to honor the 14-day freshness rule. • The bigger long-term supply-chain improvement is to pin GitHub Actions to immutable commit SHAs instead of mutable major tags like

@v7

.

Final update since my last summary: • Re-reviewed PR #13961 (

docker/build-push-action

6 → 7) under the corrected 7-day rule • Performed the deeper security/supply-chain validation you requested: ◦ verified official upstream repo and release metadata ◦ checked GitHub-verified release commits ◦ reviewed relevant upstream source changes ◦ confirmed OpenHands only uses straightforward local-context paths here ◦ rebuilt upstream

v7.1.0

from source/lockfile and confirmed a clean git status afterward ◦ confirmed relevant CI jobs in OpenHands passed • Left an AI-disclosed approval review • Merged PR #13961 • Verified it is now MERGED: https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13961 Conciseness: • No repo code changes were made locally in this task • No extraneous actions were taken beyond review + merge of the Dependabot PR Net new outcome: • The remaining eligible GitHub-related Dependabot PR, #13961, has now been approved and merged after a deeper supply-chain review.

Since my last summary, no additional code or repository changes were made. Current completion status: • Request addressed ◦ Opened the proposal issue: #14014 ▪︎ https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/issues/14014 ◦ Included the supply-chain hardening proposal to pin GitHub Actions to immutable SHAs ◦ Mentioned @aivong-openhands in the issue body for dependency/security input, based on their participation in a related Dependabot PR • Instructions followed faithfully ◦ Did a pass over workflow action usage ◦ Opened an issue rather than a PR ◦ Added AI disclosure in the issue body • Changes are concise ◦ No local code changes were made ◦ No extraneous edits/files were introduced ◦ The only new artifact was the GitHub issue itself So the work is complete, and there’s nothing further to revert or clean up locally.

Final summary of the latest work: Status • I completed the pass over workflow action dependencies and opened a proposal issue: ◦ #14014 — Pin GitHub Actions to immutable SHAs for workflow supply-chain hardening • I mentioned @aivong-openhands in the issue body because I had seen that login comment on a related Dependabot PR. • I kept the issue focused on workflow supply-chain hardening and action pinning. Important correction / caveat • One nuance was identified afterward:

OpenHands/extensions/plugins/pr-review@main

is ours, so it should not be framed as a normal third-party dependency. • It is still a mutable cross-repo dependency and still security-sensitive because it runs with write permissions and secrets. • So the issue is directionally right, but the framing would be better if it separated: ◦ true external actions (

docker/*

,

peter-evans/*

,

oven-sh/*

, etc.) ◦ from first-party mutable cross-repo refs like

OpenHands/extensions/plugins/pr-review@main

Conciseness • No local code changes were made in this last step. • No extraneous repository edits were introduced. • The only actionable artifact from this step is the GitHub issue. So: the request was mostly addressed, with one follow-up refinement advisable — updating the issue framing for

pr-review

from “third-party” to “first-party but still mutable/sensitive.”

Summary of new work since the last summary: • Per your clarification that the effective freshness rule is 7 days, I completed the deeper review of PR #13961 (

docker/build-push-action

6 → 7). • I verified it was still mergeable, clean, and had the relevant Docker/Lint/Python checks passing. • I posted an AI-disclosed approval review on #13961 with the supply-chain review findings. • I merged #13961 and deleted the Dependabot branch. • I then scanned workflow

uses:

references on

main

and identified unpinned actions, with priority on external third-party actions and noting the separate first-party

OpenHands/extensions/plugins/pr-review@main

case. • I opened issue #14014 proposing SHA pinning for workflow supply-chain hardening: ◦ https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/issues/14014 • I confirmed that

aivong-openhands

had appeared in the related PR activity and included them in the issue for dependency/security input. • After you pointed out that

pr-review

is ours, I read your edited issue first and then made a minimal edit to correct the classification: ◦

OpenHands/extensions/plugins/pr-review@main

is now framed as a first-party mutable cross-repo ref, not as third-party. ◦ I preserved your human-added preface and only adjusted the wording needed for that distinction. Conciseness / faithfulness: • The requests were fully addressed. • I followed the instruction not to overwrite your issue edits; I made only narrow wording changes. • No extraneous repository code changes were made in this last segment; the work was limited to GitHub PR/issue actions and issue text refinement.

Final summary, limited to new work since the prior OpenHands repo summaries: • Cloned and reviewed the SDK repo:

OpenHands/software-agent-sdk

• Found the relevant open Dependabot GitHub Actions PR: ◦ #2843 —

actions/github-script

8 → 9 https://github.com/OpenHands/software-agent-sdk/pull/2843 • Applied the same review standard as before: ◦ checked upstream release age against the 7-day rule ◦ verified official upstream / release provenance ◦ reviewed workflow usage for

github-script@v9

compatibility ◦ confirmed required CI checks passed • Approved with AI disclosure and merged PR #2843 • Request fully addressed for `software-agent-sdk`: there were no other relevant open Dependabot GitHub Actions PRs to handle • Changes were concise: no repository code changes were made locally; only the GitHub review/merge action on the qualifying PR was performed • No additional changes beyond that were made since the last summary In short: I completed the same Dependabot GitHub Actions review flow for OpenHands/software-agent-sdk, and safely approved + merged PR #2843.

Summary of new work since my last summary: • Cloned OpenHands/software-agent-sdk and reviewed its open Dependabot GitHub Actions PRs. • Found the relevant PR: ◦ #2843

actions/github-script

8 → 9 https://github.com/OpenHands/software-agent-sdk/pull/2843 • Verified it qualified under the 7-day rule: ◦ upstream

actions/github-script

v9.0.0 released 2026-04-09 • Reviewed compatibility/security: ◦ checked the changed workflow scripts ◦ confirmed no

require('@actions/github')

◦ confirmed no

getOctokit

redeclaration pattern ◦ confirmed required CI checks passed ◦ checked upstream provenance • Submitted an AI-disclosed approval review • Merged PR #2843 Also completed the follow-up SHA-pinning analysis for `software-agent-sdk`: • Scanned workflow action usage on

origin/main

• Distinguished: ◦ external third-party actions ◦ first-party mutable cross-repo refs • Opened a proposal issue: ◦ #2876 — [Proposal] Pin GitHub Actions to immutable SHAs https://github.com/OpenHands/software-agent-sdk/issues/2876 • In that issue, called out: ◦ first-party mutable refs in

OpenHands/extensions

◦ Docker publishing actions ◦ broad bootstrap actions like

astral-sh/setup-uv

◦ token-bearing comment/dispatch/notification actions Conciseness: • The work was focused on exactly what you asked: ◦ review/merge relevant GitHub-related Dependabot PRs in

software-agent-sdk

◦ then perform the same workflow SHA-pinning analysis and open an issue • I did not make local code changes in the repository. • I did not add extraneous edits beyond the GitHub review/merge actions and the new issue. Overall: • Request fully addressed • Instructions followed faithfully • No unnecessary repository changes introduced

Final summary since my last update: • The request was completely addressed. • I reviewed OpenHands/OpenHands#13934 under the 7-day freshness rule and with a supply-chain/security check. • I submitted an AI-disclosed approval review. • I merged the PR successfully. Conciseness: • No additional repository code changes were made beyond the PR merge/review action. • No extraneous local changes were introduced. There’s nothing new to add beyond the prior summary; the PR review/approval/merge work is complete.

what other dependabot PRs are there? address them if you can, just be careful @nutritious-balloon-65098 when I ask you to summarize, make sure you give me their links

Final summary of new work since my last summary: • Reviewed OpenHands/OpenHands#13934 under the same 7-day / supply-chain rules. ◦ Link: https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13934 ◦ Result: approved and merged. ◦ Verified: ▪︎ final net diff was only the

uv.lock

Pygments bump ▪︎ unrelated wheel churn had already been removed ▪︎ upstream

pygments 2.20.0

was older than 7 days ▪︎ lock hashes matched PyPI metadata ▪︎ CI was green • Scanned the remaining open Dependabot PRs in OpenHands/OpenHands and handled the safe ones carefully. • Approved and merged: ◦ #13935 — pytest 9.0.3 ▪︎ https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13935 ▪︎ Verified final lockfile state, upstream release age (>7 days), hash consistency, allowed constraints, and green CI. ◦ #13829 — node:25.9-trixie-slim ▪︎ https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13829 ▪︎ Verified official Docker Hub tag metadata, age (>7 days), and green CI. • Left these open intentionally because they did not meet the bar for safe merge yet: ◦ #13932 — frontend security-all group ▪︎ https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13932 ▪︎ Deferred because one dependency (

follow-redirects 1.16.0

) was still under 7 days old. ◦ #13938 — frontend eslint group ▪︎ https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13938 ▪︎ Deferred because one dependency (

eslint-plugin-i18next 6.1.4

) was under 7 days old and

Lint frontend

was failing. ◦ #13806 — root Python version-all group ▪︎ https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13806 ▪︎ Deferred because it is a large grouped update with major-version jumps and is also conflicting/dirty. ◦ #12806 — frontend version-all group ▪︎ https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/12806 ▪︎ Deferred because it is a broad grouped frontend update that needs deeper manual review. Conciseness check: • No repository code changes were made locally as part of this pass. • Actions were limited to GitHub review/merge operations and dependency triage. • I did not attempt risky merges on grouped or too-fresh dependency updates.

Final summary since my last summary: • Posted explanatory deferment comments on all four PRs that I intentionally left open: ◦ #13932 — https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13932 ◦ #13938 — https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13938 ◦ #13806 — https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13806 ◦ #12806 — https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/12806 • Included the reason on each PR so maintainers know why it was deferred: ◦ #13932: still inside the 7-day freshness hold ◦ #13938: still inside the 7-day freshness hold, and

Lint frontend

is failing ◦ #13806: broad/riskier grouped Python update and currently conflicting ◦ #12806: broad grouped frontend update deferred for manual review • Included AI disclosure in each posted comment. Conciseness: • No repository code changes were made in this step. • Only the requested PR comments were added. • No extraneous changes were introduced.

Final summary of new work since my last summary: Status • Posted explanatory deferment comments on all currently deferred Dependabot PRs in

OpenHands/OpenHands

• Included AI disclosure in each comment • Re-checked for new Dependabot PRs • Confirmed there are no new PRs beyond the previously known open set PRs I commented on • #13932 — deferred comment posted https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13932 • #13938 — deferred comment posted https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13938 • #13806 — deferred comment posted https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13806 • #12806 — deferred comment posted https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/12806 Current open Dependabot PR set after the re-scan Still open, no new ones: • #13938 https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13938 • #13932 https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13932 • #13806 https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13806 • #12806 https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/12806 Already merged earlier and unchanged since the last summary: • #13935 https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13935 • #13829 https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13829 Conciseness • Changes were concise • No repository code changes were made • Only GitHub PR comments were added, plus the PR re-scan • No extraneous local changes need reverting

Final summary of new work since the last summary: • Did a fresh daily pass over all current open Dependabot PRs in

OpenHands/OpenHands

• Applied the same rules again: ◦ 7-day freshness hold ◦ upstream/package provenance checks ◦ CI/check status review ◦ cautious merge only for low-risk candidates • Approved and merged PR #13932 ◦ https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13932 • Reviewed the newly appeared PR #14036 and deferred it ◦ https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/14036 • Rechecked PR #13938 and kept it deferred ◦ https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13938 • Rechecked PR #12806 and kept it deferred ◦ https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/12806 • Posted updated explanatory comments on the deferred PRs that needed fresh guidance: ◦ #14036 — deferred because it is a 37-package frontend bundle with major jumps, several packages still under 7 days old, multiple failing checks, and a conflicting/dirty state ◦ #12806 — deferred because it is now stale/partially superseded by newer merged dependency work, including

#13932

Conciseness: • No repository code changes were made locally. • Only GitHub review/merge/comment actions were taken. • No extraneous actions beyond the requested fresh Dependabot pass. Current state after this pass: • Merged ◦ #13932 — https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13932 • Still open / deferred ◦ #14036 — https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/14036 ◦ #13938 — https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13938 ◦ #12806 — https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/12806 So yes: the fresh pass was completed, the safe PR was handled, and the remaining PRs were reviewed and documented carefully.

Since my last summary, there were no additional changes. Final status • Completed the fresh Dependabot pass for OpenHands/software-agent-sdk • Reviewed #2878 under the same 7-day / upstream / CI rules • Approved and merged #2878 ◦ https://github.com/OpenHands/software-agent-sdk/pull/2878 • Confirmed there were no other open Dependabot PRs in

OpenHands/software-agent-sdk

at that time Conciseness • No local code changes were made • No extraneous repository edits were introduced • The only external actions were the GitHub review + merge for #2878 So the request was fully addressed, and there is nothing new to add beyond the already reported merge of #2878: • https://github.com/OpenHands/software-agent-sdk/pull/2878

Since the last summary, I completed two additional reviews and merges: • ✅ OpenHands/software-agent-sdk#2878 ◦ https://github.com/OpenHands/software-agent-sdk/pull/2878 ◦ Reviewed

python-multipart 0.0.22 -> 0.0.26

◦ Verified: ▪︎ lockfile-only diff (

uv.lock

) ▪︎ release older than 7 days ▪︎ PyPI hashes matched lockfile ▪︎ upstream metadata pointed to the expected repo ▪︎ current required CI checks were green ◦ Submitted an AI-disclosed approval review and merged it. • ✅ OpenHands/OpenHands#13968 ◦ https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/13968 ◦ Reviewed

cryptography 46.0.7

CVE fix PR ◦ Verified: ▪︎ changes were limited to regenerated lockfiles (

poetry.lock

,

enterprise/poetry.lock

,

uv.lock

) ▪︎ release older than 7 days ▪︎ PyPI metadata/hashes matched the lockfiles ▪︎ upstream metadata pointed to

pyca/cryptography

▪︎ required CI checks were green ◦ Submitted an AI-disclosed approval review and merged it. Checklist • Addressed the newly requested agent-sdk PR • Checked for other open agent-sdk Dependabot PRs • Confirmed there were no other open Dependabot PRs in

software-agent-sdk

• Addressed the additionally requested OpenHands PR #13968 • Applied the same review rules: freshness, upstream/provenance, CI, and cautious merge decision • Used GitHub API/CLI rather than browser workflows • Included AI disclosure in posted reviews Conciseness • ✅ Changes/actions were concise • ✅ No local code changes were made • ✅ No extraneous repository edits were introduced • ✅ Only GitHub review/merge actions relevant to the requested PRs were performed