https://linen.dev logo
Join Discord
Powered by
# les-ras
  • q

    qr

    03/11/2022, 7:05 AM
    While Reynolds Stress Models appear more comprehensively formulated to capture anisotropic turbulent eddies, I keep seeing remarks here and there on the internet that they aren't necessarily as well formulated numerically, as Eddy viscosity models are.
  • p

    Pizza

    03/11/2022, 7:38 AM
    Yes RNG K epsilon model
  • p

    Pizza

    03/11/2022, 7:41 AM
    Thanks a lot. Any suggestion on where can I have further information/ readings?
  • q

    qr

    03/11/2022, 7:45 AM
    IDK man, I've just gathered this from forums, application papers and such.. @User anyone?
  • p

    Pizza

    03/11/2022, 7:54 AM
    Thanks :). at least I have a start point to explain the discrepancy between the two models
  • u

    ⵣAryazⵣ

    03/11/2022, 10:34 AM
    Is it wall-bounded turbulence?
  • u

    ⵣAryazⵣ

    03/11/2022, 10:35 AM
    If so: using RSM is a waste of time as you can find in many papers
  • u

    ⵣAryazⵣ

    03/11/2022, 10:36 AM
    If your simulations involve a lot of flow separation, then kOmega SST family is better than k-epsilon family of turbulence models
  • p

    Pizza

    03/11/2022, 12:44 PM
    Nope, it is not wall-bounded turbulence. It is about the junction vortex in the downstream wake. Did try KOmega SST but it is not close to the experiment measured. RNG KE is way closer
  • w

    wittywaffles

    03/25/2022, 12:55 AM
    Can anyone help explain what is happening at my top and bottom of the mesh? I am trying to just use the symmetry patch to "ignore" the sides
  • w

    wittywaffles

    03/25/2022, 12:59 AM
    symmetry boundary condition as well
  • p

    petros8039

    03/25/2022, 9:34 AM
    Please see #810161483903401984. It seems that you are not using symmetry at top and bottom
  • s

    smit joshi

    03/28/2022, 6:30 AM
    Hi I am using k-epsilon turbulent model for simulating pressure induced flow via simplefoam While simulating bounding k and epsilon are coming very huge and ultimately stoping simulation
  • s

    smit joshi

    03/28/2022, 6:31 AM
    How do I handle this and we're i can get more info on this?
  • z

    Zino

    03/28/2022, 8:07 AM
    Almost definitely inappropriate boundary conditions or poor quality mesh
  • z

    Zino

    03/28/2022, 8:08 AM
    A simple diagram of your set up and boundary conditions will allow people to help you
  • s

    smit joshi

    03/28/2022, 5:21 PM
    i cannot share my geometry but i will give you a analogy similar to that.(sorry for this) this is a cross-section of a cube from which a cylinder is cutted out. the flow here is perpendicular to the cylindrical axis. For inlet there is pressureinletvelocity condition for velocity and for pressure zeroGradient with p=5000 For outlet there is zeroGradient for both velocity and pressure
  • s

    smit joshi

    03/28/2022, 5:25 PM
    i have tried changing relaxation factors and initial value of K and epsilon but nothing worked
  • s

    smit joshi

    03/28/2022, 5:25 PM
    also for meshing in checkMesh it is showing ok
  • m

    Malte

    03/28/2022, 5:25 PM
    Do you hav eany Dirichlet pressure BC?
  • m

    Malte

    03/28/2022, 5:27 PM
    try changing your pressure BC at inlet to fixed value
  • s

    smit joshi

    03/28/2022, 5:27 PM
    ok i will try that
  • s

    smit joshi

    03/28/2022, 5:28 PM
    also i was thinking to try directionmixed for velocity
  • s

    smit joshi

    03/28/2022, 5:28 PM
    but my flow in original model is non orthogonal so i dont know how to work that out
  • m

    Malte

    03/28/2022, 5:29 PM
    > pressure zeroGradient > zeroGradient for [...] pressure
  • m

    Malte

    03/28/2022, 5:29 PM
    Not a well posed problem if that is true
  • s

    smit joshi

    03/28/2022, 5:31 PM
    i read that openfoam have stability issues with pressure induced flows
  • m

    Malte

    03/28/2022, 5:31 PM
    Every solver has problems if your solution is definitely not unique
  • s

    smit joshi

    03/28/2022, 5:32 PM
    which solver would you recommend for this?
  • s

    smit joshi

    03/28/2022, 5:32 PM
    i am using simplefoam
1...282930...52Latest