<@U087RAJH95Z> I assume you are doing the `nf-core...
# clipseq
s
@Melina Klostermann I assume you are doing the
nf-core pipelines lint
, then I will tackle the leftover warnings in
nextflow lint
part
m
Yes. it is quite a bit. I hope I am not completely breaking it šŸ˜…
h
what kind of stuff is it saying?
m
So I created the 5 files that it needed: │ files_exist: File not found: .github/actions/get-shards/action.yml │ │ files_exist: File not found: .github/actions/nf-test/action.yml │ │ files_exist: File not found: .github/workflows/pr-comment.yml │ │ files_exist: File not found: docs/CONTRIBUTING.md │ │ files_exist: File not found: tests/default.nf.test
šŸ‘ 1
s
the nextflow warnings are also not all harmless but luckily I have working test locally so I wil do a PR only if it passes
m
But then also │ files_exist: File must be removed: lib/NfcoreTemplate.groovy │ │ files_exist: File must be removed: lib/Utils.groovy │ │ files_exist: File must be removed: lib/WorkflowMain.groovy │ │ files_exist: File must be removed: lib/WorkflowClipseq.groovy │ │ files_exist: File must be removed: pipeline_template.yml │ │ files_exist: File must be removed: lib/nfcore_external_java_deps.jar these need to be removed, becasue they are outdated, so I did that and tried to transfer to the new rules. (Or codex did it). SO I am runing the test now to see if that was ok
h
ah okay!! sounds good, thank you !
m
The good news is the test_full_small seems to be working also on our hpc and even using apptainer instead of docker :)
😲 1
🄳 1
But we definitely need to run/write tests for all the optional things afterwards
šŸ‘ 1
s
I also have apptainer on the cluster but did not get test_full_small to work šŸ˜… I will rerun it once we merge more PRs šŸ‘
šŸ‘ 1