STRINGS BEING CHANGED TO DATAFLOWVALUES WHEN EMITTED FROM A SUBWORKFLOW shakefistshakefistshakefistshakefistshakefistshakefistshakefistshakefist

I thought this was always the case? When you emit a bare value, it gets converted into a channel object

It probably was but it leads to some awkward behaviour if you want to e.g. process a raw datafile in a subworkflow with Groovy

You didn't want to use a native process for it?

Needed to be included in an

if()

statement