A community effort to collect a curated set of analysis pipelines built using Nextflow.

nf-core

CleanShot 2026-09-24 at 09.28.11@2x.png

hmm, wonder if stuff might be about to start breaking.. :grimacing:

I'm not sure off the top of my head what is using github actions vs runs-on

CleanShot 2026-09-24 at 10.08.10@2x.png

<#C025UH66DA8> seems to be the majority this month, not sure which actions would be running there?

CleanShot 2026-09-24 at 10.08.47@2x.png

CleanShot 2026-09-24 at 10.09.18@2x.png

this is the whole year, so does look like maybe these pipeline repos are doing something different to the others?

<#CJRH30T6V> kind of makes sense I think, although I myself might have had a small hand in that

I've been meaning to rewrite the configs actions for some time, we aren't checking things properly and are wasting things

<#C025UH66DA8> seems definitively a oddball here, let me investigate, I can reach to Ram/Anders about changing things

yeah, I think it runs just on GHA, and not on runs-on

-&gt; <https://github.com/nf-core/raredisease/blob/dev/.github/workflows/nf-test.yml#L62>

Any idea why it's like this? The template is presumably runs-on?

Also <#C09A1GY7J4B> and <#C05785S3TMX> I guess

Possibly a cheeky <#CGFUX04HZ> and <#CEA7TBJGJ>? Though that's not so much and only last month. Not sure which CI jobs those are, could just be high activity on small CI, which is fine (that's what GHA credits are for).

I'm not super fussed about <#CJRH30T6V> and <#CGRTMASKY> to be honest - we have headroom for those if pipelines are updated to be consistent and using runson

Though of course making configs a little more efficient is never a bad thing

not fussed about <#CJRH30T6V> but not happy about <#CGRTMASKY>, I have WIP PRs I need to finish

it's not only in-efficient, it is stupid, and not testing what we should be testing

-&gt; <https://nfcore.slack.com/archives/C025UH66DA8/p1790240449739149>

gha bleed assessment via agent

<@UQZG2UCF3> over here :point_up_2::skin-tone-2: