Hi, sorry for the stupid question. Is there a way ...
# multiqc
p
Hi, sorry for the stupid question. Is there a way to force displaying all rows of a table? I have a table where the first column has duplicated values and it just displays the first occurrence of the unique values. EDIT: v 1.35
p
Guessing that this isn't to do with tables, but rather duplicate sample names overwriting each other? In which case: https://docs.seqera.io/multiqc/usage/troubleshooting#not-enough-samples-found
p
Thanks! Basically my table has columns: condition, event_type, ... and there's multiple event_type values per condition, but it renders only the first occurrence
p
The first column is the sample ID
These must be unique in the report
p
As a workaround I have to create a hidden column with condition_event
I was thinking to report the summary of rMATS
p
Do you think it's not to do with that first column, the sample ID?
Duplication elsewhere in tables shouldn't matter
p
Yes, my first column (condition) is seen as a sample ID so it doesn't render the duplicates. I was wondering if there is an option in the config.yml to force the render of all rows. About my scenario, I don't know if others have already done anything with samples tables for the rMATS results, I was just thinking to add the summary of the analysis as it is quite compact.
so this is my current workaround
p
Sorry, travelling so short / slow messages. Brielfy: 1. No sorry. It goes much deeper than just table rows, that sample ID is used for functionality all over MultiQC so must be unique. 2. I don't know rMATS but please put in a github issue with the "new module request" template if you think it'd help! Hopefully there are ways around it. For example adding suffixes or prefixes as you have there, and can "group samples" together to show single rows if that's appropriate.
It's a little difficult to advise without knowing the subject matter sorry
A "what I want to see" screenshot and "what I actually see" screenshot might help..?
p
No prob! I showed you what I get now by adding that extra first column. In that way I avoid the collapse of the duplicated conditions. It's not ideal but it works.
👍🏻 1