David Tatarakis
01/28/2025, 2:10 PMmageck mle I notice that the resulting .sgrna_summary.txt output file predicts all sgRNAs have an efficiency of exactly 1. This seems to indicate the sgRNA efficiency component of the pipeline is either failing or not being run at all. Is there any way to diagnose what is going on here? Does the pipeline actually have the ability to incorporate sgRNA efficiency predictions?
My command is as below:
nextflow run nf-core/crisprseq \
--analysis screening \
--outdir results \
--input samplesheet.csv \
--library library.txt \
-profile docker \
--mle \
--contrasts contrasts.csv
And the output of the .sgrna_summary.txt file looks like this:
Gene sgRNA eff
CREBBP GCAAGGTCGGGCCAGACACC 1
CREBBP GGCGCAGGCGCACTGCGATC 1Laurence Kuhlburger
01/30/2025, 9:01 AMAastha Pal
02/02/2025, 7:00 PMDavid Tatarakis
02/03/2025, 12:43 PMSSC software separately and then provide the tabular file with gRNA names, sequences, and efficiencies as an input to the mageck mle command. However, it seems that this is run internally as a part of the nf-core pipeline since that file is provided as an output.
The only thing I noticed was that SSC requires the first column of the library.txt file to contain the actual sgRNA sequence. So I made sure that was the case. However, no change to the output as a result.
I suppose I could try running SSC myself separate from Nextflow. But I'm not sure if the nf-core pipeline is able to accept the sgRNAs efficiencies file as an input to MAGeCK mle. Would really love some guidance here!Aastha Pal
02/08/2025, 1:12 AMLaurence Kuhlburger
02/21/2025, 12:01 PMLaurence Kuhlburger
02/21/2025, 12:02 PM