https://livekit.io logo
Join Slack
Powered by
Is there a simple way to implement silent handoffs...
# ask-ai
g
Is there a simple way to implement silent handoffs? I want to have a triage agent that routes to other subagents that handles subprocesses but I don't want the customer to be aware of this enrouting? I've tried doing so via prompt but looks like even with hard prompting directives e.g (
*IMPORTANT*: When calling transferTo{agent}, *DO NOT* say that you are transferring me, as the client should not be aware of the agent flow.
)
✅ 1
t
Thanks for reaching out, carlos. I'm an AI assistant and I'm here to help. Give me a moment while I research this topic.
Thanks — I’m responding to your question about implementing silent handoffs so the customer doesn’t see transfers. Short answer: don’t rely on prompt-only directives. Use the agent handoff/tool return mechanism and omit any transfer message so the framework performs a silent transfer while preserving context. How to do it (two concise examples): 1) Python (return the agent without a transfer message)
Copy code
@function_tool()
async def route_to_billing(self, context: RunContext):
    # silently hand off to BillingAgent with preserved chat context
    return BillingAgent(chat_ctx=self.chat_ctx.copy(exclude_instructions=True))
2) Node.js (handoff without a 
returns
message)
Copy code
routeToBilling: llm.tool({
  description: 'Route to billing specialist',
  execute: async (_, { ctx }) => {
    return llm.handoff({ agent: new BillingAgent() }) // no 'returns' = no spoken transfer
  },
})
Key points to follow • Omit any transfer/returns message so no speech is produced. • Pass the conversation context to the receiving agent (use 
chat_ctx.copy(exclude_instructions=True)
or equivalent) so the subagent has history but can use its own instructions. • Keep tool descriptions focused on routing conditions (when to route), not how to narrate it. • Don’t rely on hard prompt instructions to suppress transfer announcements — they’re fragile. If you want, tell me which SDK/language and whether you need context filtering (what to include/exclude when handing off) and I’ll give a tailored code snippet. Sources: Agents and handoffs | LiveKit Documentation | The Handoff Pattern for Voice Agents That Replaces IVR Menus | LiveKit, with interactive elements
g
NodeJS
t
Thanks — I’ll give a concise Node.js example and the exact pattern to use for a silent handoff. Node.js example (silent handoff)
Copy code
// triageAgent.js
const { llm, Agent } = require('livekit-llm'); // adjust import to your setup

class TriageAgent extends Agent {
  constructor() {
    super({
      instructions: `You are a triage agent. Route to specialists when needed. Do not speak any transfer messages; perform silent handoffs via tool returns.`
    });
  }

  routeToBilling = llm.tool({
    description: 'Route to billing specialist',
    execute: async (_, { ctx }) => {
      // Perform a handoff without a `returns` message => silent transfer
      return llm.handoff({
        agent: new BillingAgent(),
        // no `returns` or spoken message provided
      });
    },
  });

  routeToTech = llm.tool({
    description: 'Route to technical specialist',
    execute: async (_, { ctx }) => {
      return llm.handoff({
        agent: new TechnicalAgent(),
      });
    },
  });
}

module.exports = TriageAgent;
Notes & best practices • Omit any 
returns
/ transfer message in 
llm.handoff
so the framework does not generate speech. • Ensure the receiving agent gets conversation context. If your SDK requires passing context explicitly, pass a copy of the chat context (preserve history but let the new agent use its own instructions). • Keep tool descriptions focused on routing conditions (when to call the handoff). • Avoid relying on prompt-only directives to suppress announcements — use the handoff mechanism above for reliable silence. If you want, share how you instantiate agents (and whether you need explicit context copying) and I’ll adapt the snippet to your exact setup. , with interactive elements
g
If anyone interested best solution was to explicitly say in the tool description not to say transferring to XXX agent
t
That’s a good catch — explicitly stating “do not announce transfer” in the tool description is a recommended, reliable practice alongside omitting a `returns`/message in the handoff. Concise Node.js pattern you can use:
Copy code
routeToBilling: llm.tool({
  description: 'Route to billing specialist — DO NOT announce or say you are transferring the customer.',
  execute: async (_, { ctx }) => {
    // silent handoff: no `returns` or spoken message
    return llm.handoff({ agent: new BillingAgent(), /* no returns */ });
  },
})
Why do both? • Omitted 
returns
prevents any spoken transfer. • Clear tool description guides developer intent and helps the model/tooling choose the correct silent behavior. If you want, share your agent instantiation code and I’ll adapt this to include explicit context copying or filtering. , with interactive elements
3 Views
Open in Slack
PreviousNext
Powered by