https://htmx.org logo
Join Discord
Powered by
# missing_dot_css
  • g
    please let's not require a build tool to use
  • m
    Even less.css?
  • g
    a tool for building the library is fine
  • m
    Right
  • m
    I would like to use less
  • g
    but you should be able to just drop a into your site
  • m
    less is great and I feel it was unfairly kicked out by the bootstrap people
  • m
    💯 here you dropped this 👑
  • m
    . @User
  • g
    i'd love that thank you
  • g
    i've read the free parts before
  • g
    very well-considered advice
  • g
    i can't really tell the difference between the css preprocessors
  • g
    Not to muddy the conversation too much, but my current go to seems to be pure.css because it is so tiny and adaptable. It’s easy to extend its default styles with the customizations I need. It seems similar to the goals on untitled, but does still require (too many) custom class names in the code.
  • g
    if it has nesting then good
  • g
    Pure does a really good job with responsive layouts, which I think is an important part of any good CSS lib.
  • m
    less has nesting
  • m
    it's very minimal
  • m
    i liked it and I was shouted down by "but features" people in the bay area
  • m
    I am embittered and therefore will impose my passive aggressive revenge on this project
  • g
    Tell me if I’m wrong.. I don’t think there are any Bay Area people in here.
  • g
    nesting is coming to native css too
  • m
    would love to stay close to eventual vanilla CSS
  • g
    the syntax is a bit weird for the native nesting
  • g
    so it might not be compatible with less
  • m
    😑
  • m
    less is good you will like it
  • m
    and the vars can be css vars, so it will work right
  • g
  • m
    I made it seven words into the definition of nest-prefixed
12345...44Latest