https://htmx.org logo
Join Discord
Powered by
# htmx-general
  • m
    Fine by me. Is there a better way than w/ issues?
  • g
    I just meant, I don't want to propose a bunch of stuff that doesn't fit with where you want things to head. So, if you have a roadmap (or even loose, unorganized feelings about the issue) I'd rather follow and enhance that, instead of heading off in the wrong direction.
  • m
    ah, not right now, but I hope next week to have some time to take a deep breath and figure out what's next for htmx and hyperscript
  • g
    Ok. I'll try to put a few ideas together in the meantime. Just suggestions, of course, but maybe they can factor into your deep breath.
  • e
    Can OOB swaps target elements using attributes other than 
    id
    ?
  • e
  • e
    @User Would you accept a PR that adds an option for that? 
    hx-oob-target
    perhaps?
  • g
    I was actually looking into hooking pusher (pusher.com) into htmx. So my initial thought was to use the pusher client to subscribe to their channels (websockets) api and trigger custom events that htmx could react to
  • m
    Ah, that sounds reasonable
  • m
    htmx has websocket support, you probably saw:
  • m
  • m
    But it sounds like you might want to trigger events, which would be fine
  • m
    It might end up acting more like SSE support:
  • m
  • m
  • g
    @User -- can the pusher client generate events when it receives something from a channel? If that is the case, then you might be able to use 
    hx-trigger
    to swap that content in. It still might require an extension, but that's the place to start digging.
  • g
    @mysterious-toddler-20573 - you know, 80% of my technology decisions now boil down to "what is the developer community like?" I've had one too many bad experiences with toxic developer communities, and it's just not worth it. Sure, any group that gets big enough is going to have its bell-curve of developer quality, but some communities just seem to attract too many pricks to justify using their toolsets.
  • e
  • m
    Thank you! Rather than adding another attribute, how about overloading the oob attribute to accept selectors as well as true or false?
  • e
    I think that's already used for 
    innerHTML
    , etc
  • m
    hmmm
  • m
    (i need to look at the code again)
  • m
    seems like hx-swap should be where that lives
  • m
    🤔
  • e
    Yeah, that would make sense to me too. That'd be a breaking change though 🤷‍♂️
  • m
    my specialty!
  • e
    😄
  • m
    except this one would be intentional and known up front, which is a little out of character
  • e
    I suppose we could have some logic to deprecate it, checking for the current values and supporting them, then in 2.0, drop the support for that
  • m
    a good idea
1...858687...1146Latest