https://htmx.org logo
Powered by
# htmx-general
  • m
    divide by zero šŸ˜‘
  • h
    hey @mysterious-toddler-20573 for https://github.com/bigskysoftware/htmx/pull/832 is your comment is basically we should support json and just a raw url right? Because it already works that way if so - I just don't know how to test that because it will move you off the testing page
  • h
    also I have a patch for demo to allow defining status and headers on the response - where does that live so I can pr it
  • h
  • h
    also requires an update of mock-requests
  • m
    ah, cool, i'll look again this week (I think thursday will be my htmx day)
  • h
    if you have an idea how to test it I can add it
  • h
    but by default it just moves the whole page so it blows away the test harness
  • g
    I propose tea (preferably earl grey) as an acceptable substitute for hydr@$#10n. It nourishes the body, and provides caffeine, which is the spice melange for developers.
  • m
  • g
    Answered in the most polite way I could. But man, I hate it so much when developers talk about "serious projects." I've had that argument too many times to count.
  • r
    Yup. Also doesn't make any sense. Implication: whatever did anyone do before React.. the first serious website must have came out in 2013.
  • r
    Ignoring that htmx covers huge swaths of SPA functionality.
  • h
    Is it possible to specify a swap strategy when using HX-Retarget response headers?
  • r

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_k-F-MMvQV4ā–¾

  • g
    htmx should provide something ootb for focus trapping & keyboard navigation
  • r
    @mysterious-toddler-20573
  • g
    Yes. If not In the core, then easily pluggable behaviors or grammar elements.
  • g
    Maybe something like 
    trap focus in me
  • g
  • g
    Thinking about this more, since itā€™s already an event handler, I think it would make more sense as a behavior. So then itā€™s just 
    <div id=ā€œmodalā€ script=ā€œinstall trapFocusā€>
  • g
    One way to simplify this would be to make behaviors more ā€œcomposableā€ by allowing a parent behavior to ā€œinstallā€ other behaviors within itself.
  • g
    Then I could compose an overall behavior/component out of many smaller ones without having to reference all of the individual items in my code
  • g
    It would be the difference between 
    <div script=ā€œinstall modalā€>
    and ā€˜`
  • g
    This also relates to the Web Components thread going on right now, too.
  • c
    @mysterious-toddler-20573 if some FAANG company approached you and essentially said "we want to acqui-hire bigskysoftware" what would your feelings on that be?
  • c
    ...out of sheer curiosity
  • g
    It would probably be awesome. Hopefully, theyā€™d be doing it to further the technology. If not, itā€™s all open source and I bet a few of the core people would keep it going (or fork it if @mysterious-toddler-20573 grew a goatee and turned evil)
  • m
    interesting idea!
  • m
    yeah, this feels like an extension or hyperscript feature: htmx stays pure HTML (with the good and bad that comes with that) and we offer tools to do things right as easily as possible. Fix your accessibility shizzle, HTML.
1...687688689...1146Latest