htmx

core problem is that you can't use @ when manipulating attributes programmatically: 
```js
document.body.setAttribute("@", "foo")
```
fails in the console

even though it is technically legal in html

I can work around it by excluding those attributes from swizzling, they probably wouldn't be used for CSS transitions anyway,

we already exclude id and value to avoid visual jitter

How's your swizzling visualisation coming along? Was there a call to discuss?

swizzling I think is the more proper term

Would a call be helpful to you? A few people offered to give their input recently...

This person offered to help: https://twitter.com/kerns

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointer_swizzling is where I'm taking the term from

I've interacted with <@544611067616034828> quite a bit over the years, I'm sure he could be very useful!

they said they'd have time to help w/ the diagram and looked like the most designey of the responses I got

(I must have skipped the class on swizzling back in the day!)

but I'm fine with anyone who has time cleaning up my mess

let me get high res versions on the images and then can I put you in charge of getting someone to work on the image?

It would be good for you to be a go between too, so I can have someone else who understands how the htmx request cycle works and can stop having my food tested for poison by my sons before I eat it

btw, just pushed up changes that eliminate the janky `_hyperscript.start()` stuff.  htmx has no references to hyperscript at all now, rather hyperscript listens for the `htmx:load` event and processes nodes that way.  Very clean.

I can study up on your swizzling process, would be good for me to have more insight into how it works anyway!

> hyperscript listens for the htmx:load event and processes nodes that way
Very cool!

Hey <@725789255590215732> - I just saw the your SSE proposal.  Great work, and thank you!  After one read-through, I think it's promising.  I'm going to sit with it for a bit this afternoon to see if I have anything constructive to add.

Sounds good.  Happy to have you implement if you'd like.