https://htmx.org logo
Powered by
# htmx-general
  • f
    It's a demo/bit of public experimentation, still an early WIP, pulls/feedback welcome!
  • f
    The controller for infinite scroll is a bit of experimentation, normally I wouldn't do multiline Java strings for HTML views, ha.
  • f
    Intent is to be a sort of intermediate demo for why templating is a good thing.
  • f
    This is just speculation on my part, but does using sinon.js implicitly make certain threading issues less likely to occur in testing due to the JS threading model? Do you guys have any kind of automated tests with very simple servers and something like PhantomJS, etc?
  • m
    I prefer a more RESTful hierarchy of URLs, but that isn't the native pattern for a lot of web frameworks. Logically, it doesn't matter much, although there might be some browser caching implications. I view it mainly as an aesthetic consideration, and you shouldn't feel bad doing it the way your preferred server side framework likes.
  • f
    FYI, running on macOS, was able to replicate the exact same failure scrolling quickly with both Safari and Chrome
  • f
    FYI, went ahead and opened up an issue at https://github.com/bigskysoftware/htmx/issues/463
  • m
    thank you! Can you replicate using a non-minified version, should be an easy fix
  • f
    Sure, working on project now 🙂
  • f
  • f
    Here's the stack in console with the version from GitHub: Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'toUpperCase' of undefined at issueAjaxRequest (htmx.js:2144) at maybeReveal (htmx.js:1066) at htmx.js:1055 at forEach (htmx.js:222) at htmx.js:1054
  • m
    perfection, thank you!
  • f
    Ha, not a JS person but following that stack back up super confusing how that verb (which should be a get) is null on 2144.
  • f
    FWIW as an experiment I tried changing to hx-swap="afterend settle:1s" and adding the settle:1s made it much, much quicker to die with the same stack
  • f
    Just changed to settle:0s and now I can't get it to generate the error no matter how fast I scroll. 🤔
  • b
    Just wanted to say, the more I use HTMX, the more it feels like I'm cheating. How can I squeeze out this much awesome without a line of JS?!? Isn't this everybody's dream? (unless your in the cult of JS 🤣 )
  • m
    🙂 fun once you get the hang of it isn't it? glad to hear it's working out well for you!
  • s
    Why I don't do "if ... then return full-page else return fragment"? I don't know. Just a gut feeling. I like it conditionless. I am happy for every condition I can avoid. Like on the linux command line. One tool should do one thing. With htmx you can choose the URL pattern you prefer. So it does not matter much in this context.
  • s
    How to create minimal htmx examples with code sharing plattforms like jsfiddle? If you use hx-get or hx-post you need a server which creates a http response. This is needed for reproduceable examples in github issues or Stackoverflow questions. Not everybody has a server where he can upload a working example. What do you think?
  • g
    Glitch runs nodejs server apps, I think
  • s
    Thank you for this hint. Maybe a server is not needed. If you use 
    hx-get
    , then you just need an URL which content you can edit.
  • s
    To be honest, I won't have time and knowledge to improve the core htmx. But I really love this project and would like to see it in healthy state. What can I do? Would it help if I donate a small amount monthly?
  • m
    Checkout the github sponsors page https://github.com/sponsors/bigskysoftware#sponsors
  • m
    One simple way to mock static server responses is with https://designer.mocky.io/
  • s
    Bingo! Mocky is what I was looking for. Thank you!
  • n
    glitch would work great for sharing runnable examples with source code
  • m
    Never heard of glitch before, looks pretty useful.
  • s
    could you please share a simple htmx example with a hx-get/hx-post on glitch?
  • s
    I am a bit disappointed by the "Run Code Snippet" feature of Stackoverflow. You are able to create a snippet with a nice GUI (for sub-windows: HTML/CSS/JS/Result), but once you finished with this popup window, you only have text. You can't open the snippet again in the nice GUI. ... Grrrr Nevertheless I created a question: e.querySelectorAll is not a function https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67289814/htmx-e-queryselectorall-is-not-a-function
  • s
    .... Oh sorry, you are able to edit the snippet again. It is just a bit hidden. https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/350456/how-to-edit-a-snippet-once-inserted-in-the-stack-overflow-answer
1...230231232...1146Latest