I seem to remember flash matrix was crap

I render triangles but I have not looked at perf. And this is really my first serious foray into 3D so I have nothing to compare with

I don't really even know how to measure it

got any pointers on GL perf ?

just my trilateral/trilateral3/cornercontour is setup with all toolkits and webgl

so you see the differences in how complex you can draw

Looking at your repo, it seems that for the vertex shader, you are using what openfl does, which when I do the same for openfl, it disappears for some reason

disappears?

the bitmap which I apply the shader disappears whenever I apply it

and it's basically like, the "hello world" of rendering images, nothing really changes much except the vertex shader, which then I apply an uniform matrix that I use with a basic vec4 variable

you have to setup the image stuff properly

this is a pure webgl test https://nanjizal.github.io/contourTextureMouse/index.html

so the details of setup for Lime/NME/WebGL are quite similar... so the code here...

I will try to look again into the thing but I swear to you I have it set all correctly and it just disappears

so this sort of stuff.. https://github.com/nanjizal/cornerContour/tree/main/src/cornerContour/shaderTarget/limeTarget needs to be updated with implementations for some parts of this https://github.com/nanjizal/cornerContour/tree/main/src/cornerContour/web

if you look at the dice demo it does all 3D with geom lib but has no image https://nanjizal.github.io/dice/binWebGL/index.html

so really the important part is just to do image 2D with shader and then can be extended

geom provides nice 3d matrix support

I need to work on dualQuaternions a bit

but lighting etc.. that is even more work

only drawing cubes right now and not very many. Will get to model loaders in a bit and then things will get a log more complex. I don't quite see how the lime layer could add much to anything but the binding of vars for the shaders once everything is loaded. Of course openfl's texture caching and such could be an issue. I'll have to look at how to write a benchmark test of some kind - measure something like triangles per second. Of course I'm on a 1050Ti on a laptop so there's that. Need to separate software stack, driver, and hardware in the timings too I guess. Hmmm... sounds like another rabbit burrow 🐰 🐇 🙂

ok for instance this is lime ( webgl ) https://nanjizal.github.io/cornerContourSamples/bin/hxLime/html5/bin/index.html this is webgl https://nanjizal.github.io/cornerContourSamples/bin/hxWebGL/index.html

For me the pure WebGL is better yet they are just a shader and array of data

so really there should be less difference, but what do you see when you run them

openfl can be even slower..

Not worked out the differences but maybe you know

These appear to be static pages - I don't see how to run them

@orange-van-60470 ^

they generate the shapes with code they only run once.

oh when they load ? in which case I cannot tell any difference on my machine