https://linen.dev logo
Join Discord
Powered by
# lime
  • s
    I mean, what happens, on a technical level, when you run 
    haxelib run lime setup
    and tell it to install the alias?
  • b
    it did this i am think:
  • s
    Okay, so it literally does copy Lime.exe to the Haxe directory.
  • s
    On Windows, anyway.
  • a
    yeha
  • a
    neat
  • a
    then you need to have that dir in your path
  • b
    so it is only copy from lib-folder, e.g. 
    C:\HaxeToolkit\haxe\lib\lime\8,0,0\templates\bin
    into haxe folder 
    C:\HaxeToolkit\haxe
  • b
    (cos there is also the haxe.exe and path is already set)
  • s
    OH, I see. It tries to read the system variable HAXEPATH, assumes where it is if it's not present, then copies the file. In my case, neither the variable nor the default path exist. Seems like an oversight by whoever created the Chocolatey package not to set HAXEPATH...
  • s
    Okay, I've figured it out. lime.exe is on path and everything is working as it should. Thanks for the help.
  • b
    \o/
  • a
    Yeah Sometimes third party package managers have issues
  • a
    No information available.
  • v
    how do i compile in hashlink? i was trying to get it to work for 5 hours straight but every time new errors would pop up currently im stuck with this error (in the screenshot) i have: lime git hashlink nightly 32 bit heaps git
  • p
    1. Do 
    git submodule update --init
    (in the lime directory) to fix the missing 
    hl.h
    include. 2. You can't use Lime and Heaps together. (Heaps used to have a lime backend, but it was removed a long time ago)
  • v
    ive already tried that and those errors would pop up
  • p
    Are you using a fork of lime?
  • v
    no
  • p
    I'm asking because the commit the error mentions is a commit from the upstream cairo repo used in player-03's restructure and update submodules PR. I would suggest deleting lime and cloning it again.
  • p
    And in your previous screenshot it mentions the include path 
    lib/custom/cairo/src
    , which is only a thing in the PR I just mentioned. So it seems you've checked out that PR, but the submodule remote URLs haven't updated.
  • a
    why are you asking about heaps in lime?
  • v
    lime seems more convenient for me
  • a
    sure, but heaps and lime aren't linked in anyway, so it was a confusing message
  • v
    is there a heaps version or a fork that has lime
  • a
    no, they're not linked in any way...
  • p
    Heaps used to have a lime backend, but it was removed a long, long time ago.
  • a
    its' still there in the commits if you go back far enough
  • a
    but that way madness lies
  • v
    alright i guess i wont use lime
1...333435...138Latest