A 66 year old woman is offered a lump sum of $106,...
# general
s
A 66 year old woman is offered a lump sum of $106,000 or an annual payment of $18,300 for life. Which should she take?
🧡 1
m
Annual payment... Even in the first year, the investment benefits from the lump sum are less than the annual payment...
Annual payment after 20 years at 8 percent: 873k Lump sum after 20 years at 8 percent: 494k
💯 1
s
Thought so. But there's the fear of who knows what will be in the future
m
you win pretty quickly with this one
if everyone is healthy…
n
@mysterious-tomato-10057 if the investment benefits from the lump sum in the first year are greater than the annual payment, then the question is absurd, but even if it's lower, the lump sum could be the better option, because there is the lump sum itself. Only disagreeing on the implication of your first point.
Other points to consider: Is collection guaranteed? Are there tax ramifications?
m
@nutritious-raincoat-28876 agreed. I wasn’t confident with my reasoning so I ran numbers. My intuition was correct but I couldn’t come up with the right intuitive reasoning, any suggestions how to eyeball the answer ?
n
I'm not aware of any. TVM calculations are hard to eyeball.
👍 1
m
I’ll stick to using my calculator lol
😂 1
n
The first annual payment would be paid at the same time as the lump sum would have been paid? Or a year later?
s
Probably a year later
n
Even assuming a high return rate of 10%, the annual payments outpace the lump sum in a little over 9 years.
At 8%, it's a little over 8 years.
b
Are these amounts tax free? If not, another reason to take the annual payment as the lump sum will be taxed at a higher rate..
💯 1
r
Whichever company is supplying the payment, will they be around for the next 20 years to make the payments? And how long is the person expected to live?
s
Good questions, no answers