(re @ady2333 : Event did happen ofc but so far not seen any t...) Maybe we’d be at 40c otherwise. Or $2. Poor indicator.

EF is a thing that exists currently. But if you want change, miner vote is the established way to do that.

(re @R : Maybe we’d be at 40c otherwise. Or $2. Poor in...) Maybe but still can't see any benefits as of now

there is a slight gap between miner vote and twitter presence

but this should be a vote nonetheless

This is reasonable. But, I have to say anon1111's bullying and tactics is making less receptive to the argument.

I think either we give it back it better late than never or we keep it and hope people forget/care less with time

(re : I think either we give it back it...) Issue will go away with time so isn't a big deal

(re : but this should be a vote nonetheless) Votings are for the chain, community can do what it wants beyond that but doesn’t control the twitter

But I wouldn't say it's had any benefit for us

It’s the only mode of governance

(re : It's a bear market, dude. Correl...) I didnt say anything about price, its just a silly hill to die on that I happen to strongly disagree with

Maybe we should also vote to see who core devs can follow on twitter, or what clothes they wear

It's very old drama from 2017 won't change between them. I think the most productive outcome is make it an account focused on the benefits on mining and PoW projects. Give multiple projects tweetdeck access have some generic guidelines on posts. Both Charles and Bob lose in a way. Miners win which is best post merge.

(re : This is reasonable. But, I have ...) Im not trying to bully sorry if it came off like that - when you are in a disagreement with people who want to sweep something under the rug and reject discussion, you sort of have to make a ruckus

Yeah probably best option at the moment

Clearly a mistake. But, many mistakes in thus life you have to end up living with. The question is what fixes this mistake and nothing does. Give it back, ETC community doesn't really change community. Charles believes we ended up helping scsm coin. The other side of this conversation has license to go on ad infinitum about how stupid giving it back was, but as aberg states, that probably dies after a few years. But, my view, is that it would die anyway, no matter what we do.

(re : fairly sure it's necessary to hav...) This is exactly the reason, Charles talks about it too. This purpose of the twitter for ETC was to build it up and use it to get listed on those greasy CEX’s that’s why even though it’s not a ETC twitter it still has 100’s of thousands of followers. They’re clearly bots and not devoted ETC community members.

Some historical context. https://cryptocurrency.market/ethereum-classic-for-investors-11-2017-q1-update-with-former-ethereum-co-founder-charles-hoskinson/

(re @Armeanio : It's very old drama from 2017 won't change bet...) I support for for the record, thanks

(re : Clearly a mistake. But, many mis...) Armenia made a good suggestion don't make it an ergo centric account

Make it into general pow

(re @AustenMilbarge : This is exactly the reason, Charles talks abou...) It’s hasn’t worked, so I’m impartial to the whole thing. Just head down DCA’ing. It will blow over.

It was my initial proposal to bob.

Sure you are. You want your way, a coerced moral choice is a bad moral choice too.

He said oh I'm going to contact twitter and resolve it. I said I would do the same, given the situation, have fun. Let's talk after.

Doesn't necessarily need his approval

Right. Bob doesn't want that because it's an ETC account. Charles doesn't want us to give to ETC because he thinks its a scam chain, and hey, why not put these followers to good use. Reasonable arguments.

(re : Sure you are. You want your way,...) When I voice my opinion it's coercion? Surprised by the accusation

(re : Right. Bob doesn't want that bec...) Yeah but bob isn't etc. I'm sure there will be some members of etc that would be receptive