I feel that the ability to delete glossary term should be parked under a privilege somehow.. currently, I can set the privileges such that non owners cannot edit the description, ownership of a term, but anyone with the manage glossary privilege can delete the term or rename the term 👀 But I guess for now, I should just limit the ability to create glossary terms to only trusted users.
b
bulky-soccer-26729
06/14/2022, 1:54 PM
yeah that's correct for the time being, but your concern definitely makes sense. We have it on our radar to allow for more fine-grained privileges around the glossary!
b
big-carpet-38439
06/14/2022, 2:39 PM
At least for renaming having this under metadata privileges makes sense
big-carpet-38439
06/14/2022, 2:39 PM
But for deletion of a term... It's unclear
big-carpet-38439
06/14/2022, 2:39 PM
Since you may not want owners of an individual term to have "Curation capability"
b
better-orange-49102
06/14/2022, 2:59 PM
i was playing with delete terms and noticed that the term disappeared from DB entirely when i delete from UI... which got me wondering, in an environment where i'm not supposed to fully trust my users, how do i stop users from hard deleting my datasets silently (since the edit privileges dont cover deletion)? is the kafka events the only "logs" left from such actions being called? (lately, been examining Datahub from an auditing perspective)