https://discord.cloudflare.com logo
Join Discord
Powered by
# functions
  • e
    That is indeed a discrepancy between Miniflare and Workers. That would be a good issue to flag. Can you create an issue on the GitHub?
  • e
    @dfcowell 👆
  • s
    is paid workers plan also available for pages functions?
  • d
    Can do. On a plane right now, but once I’m back home and at my computer I’ll hop to it. 👍🏼 Thanks for confirming!
  • e
    Not yet, will be when they go GA. But you can request to have your limit raised if you want
  • s
    possible to request cpu time increase to 50ms?
  • w
    If you have Workers paid then you get that AFAIK
  • s
    @User but it looks like at the moment pages functions is running on free tier only
  • w
    I believe it should follow your Workers plan since it does basically make a Worker on your account
  • w
    I may be wrong so worth verifying
  • e
    I am fairly certain @Walshy | Pages is correct and it follows the plan on your account. So if you upgrade to the $5 bundled plan, that should also upgrade your Pages Functions.
  • s
    nice. thanks!
  • s
    hey I am using this command to run functions locally. It was working fine on my Mac but today i cloned the repo on windows 11 machine and when i tried to call the api it throws 
    404
    on 
    /api/auth/send-otp
    (file structure 
    functions/api/auth/send-otp.js
    ) but working fine for the root level api i.e 
    /api
    Copy code
    npx wrangler pages dev --binding JWT_SECRET_KEY="this is super secret key" TEXTLOCAL_SENDER_ID="ADHOMS" --kv OTP --proxy 3000 -- npx next dev
    did anyone else faced similar issue?
  • s
    it only picking up the 
    /api/index.js
    route. everything else is throwing 
    404
  • a
    Is there any to debug live / preview deployment? If the worker throws an exception, cloudflare says to look at logs of worker. But where is it? 
    wrangler2
    (@beta) using 
    miniflare
    behaves quite differently to actual pages function. For example: https://github.com/cloudflare/wrangler2/issues/165#issuecomment-1003532637
  • w
    hey there, in my pages function, i have some data i want to cache, however, KV costs money when used over 1GB, is there any free way to cache this data?
  • j
    You could use the 
    cache.put
    etc. APIs and construct dummy responses to store it if you wanted, and don't really care about when it's not cached, since that's colo specific. KV is probably your best option though if you don't want to go external.
  • j
    Oh actually I've no idea if the cache APIs work in functions - they should I imagine? Otherwise something like https://upstash.com/ could be worth looking at if you want to go external. That'll probably end up being more expensive than KV I imagine though
  • w
    They should work yeah
  • w
    does the cache API allow me to cache by query string?
  • w
    you define the cache key so yes if you wanted to
  • j
    cache.match
    works with 
    Request
    objects, so yeah you could create one that's defined with a query string, etc.
  • w
    KV is wonderful though
  • w
    oh cool, ill try it out
  • j
    +1 for KV though yeah. What are you caching that'll exceed 1GB out of interest?
  • w
    I'm not sure that it would exceed 1GB of space, but I want to cache dns lookups that my app uses
  • j
    Caching DNS lookups? Is there much of a performance hit when you're not doing that? I'd be shocked
  • w
    I'm honestly not sure if there is much of a performance hit at the moment
  • w
    yeah I'd probably use Cache API there with like a 5 min TTL
  • w
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1...505152...392Latest