interesting, the Lucee teams considers performance issues bugs.. let us know what you find

I have placed my virtual directory config into Application.cfc's pseudo-constructor with the following code;

this.mappings["/dbsetup"] = "#this.basePath#/dbsetup/";

And when I dump the variables scope, inside the this struct is;

/dbsetup	    string	/srv/www/app/dbsetup/

Where the path is shown, correctly. If I attempt to go the URL;

<http://myApp.localhost:8080/dbsetup/index.cfm>

I get an error, stating the page can't be found because the

dbsetup/index.cfm

is being appended to the Application Root, as you can see from the CGI scope;

cf_template_path	 string	/srv/www/app/webroot/dbsetup/index.cfm

If I create the mapping within the Lucee Administrator, the mapping works correctly / as expected. What am I missing? Thanks!

lucee docs are publishing again, the hardwired jdk8 version was no longer available and the build was failing silently https://github.com/lucee/lucee-docs/runs/6652220496?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:31 I must get around to updating it to just use script-runner

just added some more detail to cfhttp throwOnError, method and url are included in the detail of the exception https://luceeserver.atlassian.net/browse/LDEV-4011

also just added support for skip=true to the 5.3 build which will allow us to merge in a heap of unsolved, thus skipped test cases, which should drastically reduce the number of outstanding PRs https://github.com/lucee/Lucee/pulls currently 180

Has anyone had problems with Lucee 5.3.9 and the S3 extension? If I use extension version 0.9.4.x, adding S3 mapping breaks my regular mappings. If I use extension version 2.0.0.93-RC, I get this error:

java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class com.amazonaws.services.s3.S3CredentialsProviderChain
at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3ClientBuilder.standard(AmazonS3ClientBuilder.java:46)
at org.lucee.extension.resource.s3.AmazonS3Client.create(AmazonS3Client.java:74)
at org.lucee.extension.resource.s3.AmazonS3Client.<init>(AmazonS3Client.java:69)

Is there documentation somewhere about developing cache extensions and the cache interface requirements? I'm trying to troubleshoot some issues with using the MongoDB extension as session storage, and hoping to improve / optimize the cache extension (most of it was released as beta by Andrea Capolonghi about 7 years ago and I would like to "finish it").

I am porting a legacy application with about 500.000 lines of code (with horrible architecture, as usual 😉) from ACF to Lucee. Most of the stuff requires just minor adjustments, but I have one case where an app specific mapping is not available inside a CFC and and therefore instantiation of another CFC instantiation fails. It's a case of

include cfm

->

include cfm

->

include cfm

->

include cfm

->

call CFC method

->

new mapped.path.OtherCFC()

. In the last cfm I can dump

this.mappings

and everything is there, but in the CFC method none of those are available. I tried

GetPageContext().getConfig().getApplicationMappings()

to see which mappings are available, but apparently that does not list app specific mappings. Does anybody have an idea how I could go about finding out why the mappings are "missing" or how to fix that?

just did a blitz on merging test cases, only 149 open PRs now, down from 180

ok, now down to 138, including removing old cruft which will reduce the size of the core build and slightly speedup the initial deploy due to less files being written out to the file system https://luceeserver.atlassian.net/browse/LDEV-3343

Very cool

With new build process are these snapshots installable now via commandbox

yeah, but only when the build is green... https://github.com/Ortus-Lucee/forgebox-cfengine-publisher/runs/6681257137?check_suite_focus=true

basically, if it's on the lucee download page, it should be available in command box and docker within minutes

Noit sure who can help - but the Lucee dev forums are currently down 😞

There is an issue with the date/time documentation. The Lucee Docs state that the mask for minutes is

nn/NN

and time markers are

tt/TT

It then goes onto say at the bottom;

The function follows Java date time mask. For details, see the section Date and Time Patterns at

and then provides a link to an Oracle Java docs page. However, the Oracle doc page has "mm" for minutes and

t

doesn't even exist. The Lucee Docs for

parseDateTime()

are the same. The Lucee Docs for

lsParseDateTime()

- don't even show the mask - it just refers to you the Oracle docs. If you use the Oracle Docs as "your" reference - you're code will give you the wrong results; "mm" does NOT give you the minutes- it gives you the month

Can anyone see what I am doing wrong here?

<cfscript>
answersStr = {};
resultStr = {};

//Struct for answer 1	
answersStr.insert("value", 30);
answersStr.insert("description", "Q1 Desc.");
//Add Answer 1 to result Struct
resultStr.insert("Q1", answersStr);
	
answersStr.clear();
answersStr.insert("value", 100);
answersStr.insert("description", "Q2 Description");
resultStr.insert("Q2", answersStr);

writeDump(resultStr);
</cfscript>

It gives the following output What happened to the values for Q1? They obviously got overridden by Q2 - but why? If I dump it directly after the Q1 insert into resultStr I get Q1's correct data. Struct Q1 Struct description string Q2 Description value number 100 Q2 Struct description string Q2 Description value number 100

Just in case - it was missed earlier, The Lucee forums are (still) down.

without diving in, remember, unlike ACF, lucee passes by reference, u probably need to duplicate

dev.lucee.org is back up, tho posts are marked unread, my inbox zero goal is looking challenging

Check out this inconsistency in Lucee where function argument defaults aren't applied when • the UDF was called via

argumentCollection

with not all args supplied • named arguments were used • full null support is enabled https://trycf.com/gist/b5724b0207694e00ed506327a066332d/lucee5?theme=monokai

I am receiving an error when attempting to downgrade MySQL to any version 8.0.18 and below. The error received from Lucee is the following:

Communications link failure The last packet sent successfully to the server was 0 milliseconds ago. The driver has not received any packets from the server.

Is there something I am doing wrong or is this possibly a bug?

Don't know if anyone noticed on lucees docs site: I've contributed some small css changes to the Lucee docs page some days ago. Now code snippets won't unpredictably break on smaller devices/views anymore. The code will now keep intact and the snippets horizontally scrollable like its also done by other docs sites: making the lucee docs site more responsive.

After finally getting our production environment converted from ACF to Lucee Friday night, I've run into a problem we never detected in testing. Lucee sends HTML emails with the

Content-Transfer-Encoding

value as

7bit

and to conform with the mime message RFC, it automatically inserts new lines when a line is over 998 characters in length. However, this ends up breaking some minified CSS we inject into the message, because it's add a new line into a rule which ends up breaking the rest of the CSS. I wrote up a thread on this: https://dev.lucee.org/t/issue-with-cfmail-due-to-it-splitting-long-lines/10364 My current hack to resolving this is to just add new lines after every ending curly bracket (i.e.

}

) in the minified CSS, but I'd like a better solution. I wish I could just change the message to use

quoted-printable

for the message and then have Lucee not insert the newlines. Anyone have any thoughts?

i am trying to loop over a a cfm file which has lot of data inside it, want to extract all the links which starts with <script src=", i did with javascript but how with CF, i just need a start to understand

rematch/rematchnocase

Jsoup

Is the answer

oh, i thought a regular expression matching function which returns an array of its matches was the answer