Hi Guys Problem: Async Event Gateway is not sending data to custom CFC’s OnIncomingMessage() method Details: I have created an Event Gateway in the Lucee Web Admin, using the Async type. I have added the AsynchronousEventsListener as the

Listener Component

and a Custom CFC path to the

CFC

field When I make the following call:

SendGatewayMessage(“eventName”, data)

The data gets passed to the

AsynchronousEvents.cfc ->  AsynchronousEventsListener.cfc ~ OnIncomingMessage()

But the data never gets sent to my Custom CFC via the method

OnIncomingMessage()

Does anyone know why?

@zackster i came across this post today and didn’t realize that there were more debugging support https://dev.lucee.org/t/what-to-use-for-debugging-monitoring-and-security/7883/5 now that lucee 6 is being trialed what things have been/will be implemented for this feature?

does cffile s3 has any property for region, i searched along but could not find one

Puzzler for y’all: I’m trying to reproduce an error which has this in the output

<td valign="top" bgcolor="#ff9900" style="border : 1px solid #000000;empty-cells:show;

which I am finding is lucee’s

HTMLDumpWriter

. You would expect to see this in the result of a

cfdump

right?, but you’ll see that lucee cfdump output doesn’t have inline style attributes, it has a style tag and uses classes like

luceeH1

which appears to come from the Dump.cfc custom tag bundled with lucee: https://github.com/lucee/Lucee/blob/6.0/core/src/main/java/resource/library/tag/Dump.cfc#L616

On Lucee 5.x: does anyone know how NOT to get a space between the minus sign and the negative number when using LSNumberFormat? So I want a negative number to show as "-7" and NOT "- 7". I am just not getting it I think, trying to work around this 😉

i used the lucee way of creating a directory in a different which is Australis

<cfdirectory action="create" directory="#arguments.pathS3#" storeacl="#myarray#">

array is like this to give permissions

[{email="<mailto:xxx@yyy.com|xxx@yyy.com>", permission="full_control"}, {group="all", permission="read"}]

but it seems its defaulting to US, how can i make it do it from region specific and that is for Australia

fixed it, i dumped cfdirectory and used another way of doing it

because it does not support all regions

Need to spin up a new client server soon (single website), is there a reason not to use Ubuntu 22.04 LTS in 2023 with Lucee 5.x (latest stable) (and, i suppose, CommandBox/cfConfig?

Hi all, I had Lucee installed (a 5.2.8.x) version and tried upgrading to 5.3.10.x - that wen't horribly wrong for some reason, the entire Lucee Admin's were kaput! Then I removed everything and installed via Vivio tech installer the latest 5.3.10.120 version of Lucee. But now it will not install completely as it says the Apache Tomcat 9.0 Lucee service already exists. It is there in the Windows Services, but I cannot start/stop/restart it. It is not present in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE as a service either. What to do? Tried 4 different versions to remove a service in Windows, all say the service doesn't exist. Anyone an idea?

I would love to see Lucee on here. https://replit.com/templates/languages

Hello! I have about 20 datasources in the Lucee admin on my local machine, now I want to create same on another machine. Adding those 20 one by one is very hectic job. Is there way I can find the datasource file from my local machine and place that in another machine, restarting Lucee add those 20 here. Thank you!

anyone have a good way to uninstall lucee extensions from the command line?

so just splitting out from the above thread, i reckon i'll update the lucee installer to allow passing in / selecting a lucee fat jar (also via the command line) allowing you to use the latest installer with older versions, so you can then go an install the latest java / tomcat combo with an older (or newer) version of lucee

If I have an object instance with some properties, it there a way to get all the properties as a struct without having to call every getter?

This message is for the person who developed the MongoDb Database and Cache extension for Lucee. A while back you created a new test release of the extension for me (version 3.12.8.144) because the "MongoDb (Beta)" driver was not showing up in the create cache feature in the Lucee Administrator Cache page. I have tested this new version out and it seems to work correctly and was wondering if that release can get added to the official releases for that extension. As of now, the current release of that extension is 3.12.8.133.

Are there any online logging services like HoneyBadger that could be used for CF error logging?

Hey - anyone got an example handy of using cfdistributedlock in cfscript for the redis extension? I have the redis extension hooked up to default Object cache. Gpt game me this.. which doesn't look convincing. thanks.

// Create a Redis client object
redis = createObject("java", "redis.clients.jedis.Jedis").init("localhost")

// Define the key and value to be written to the Redis cache
key = "myKey"
value = "myValue"

// Acquire a distributed lock for the key
lockName = "redis_lock_" & key
lockTimeout = 5000 // Lock timeout in milliseconds
lock = cfdistributedlock.acquire(lockName, lockTimeout)

// If the lock is acquired successfully, write the value to the Redis cache
if (lock.isAcquired()) {
    redis.set(key, value)
    
    // Release the lock
    lock.release()
} else {
    writeOutput("Failed to acquire lock for key: " & key)
}

Q: Do you use the Lucee syntax to get things done or do you play it safe?

Any of you ever see an error like this? I getting it on trycf when passing a variable that uses safe path operator into arrayLen (https://trycf.com/gist/6ffdae68dc6a89017042e64b42ed8fb3/lucee5?theme=monokai) :

Expecting a stackmap frame at branch target 55 Exception Details: Location: main1683037896331_ebf01615_d507_cc4a_2dd2_6c6bc52d4398_cfm7020$cf$3e4.call(Llucee/runtime/PageContext;)Ljava/lang/Object; @5: iconst_1 Reason: Expected stackmap frame at this location. Bytecode: 0x0000000: 2bb6 003c 4d04 9900 2e2b 2b2b 2b2b 2bb6 0x0000010: 0040 2ab4 0042 0332 01b6 0046 b200 4c01 0x0000020: b600 462a b400 4204 3201 b600 4fb8 0055 0x0000030: b800 5a58 a700 a04e 2db8 0060 9900 052d 0x0000040: bf2d b800 643a 042b 1904 0404 b600 682b 0x0000050: 126a b600 6e2b b600 722a b400 4205 322b 0x0000060: 2bb6 0072 2ab4 0042 0632 05bd 0074 5903 0x0000070: 2bb6 0072 b200 77b9 007c 0200 5359 0412 0x0000080: 7e53 b600 82b9 0086 0300 572b 126a b600 0x0000090: 6e2b b600 892b 2b14 008a b800 90b6 006e 0x00000a0: 2b2b 2bb6 0072 2ab4 0042 0532 b900 7c02 0x00000b0: 00b8 0095 b600 6ea7 000c 3a05 2bb6 0098 0x00000c0: 1905 bf2b b600 98a7 000d 3a06 2b2c b600 0x00000d0: 9b19 06bf 2b2c b600 9b01 b0 Exception Handler Table: bci [5, 52] => handler: 55 bci [149, 186] => handler: 186 bci [5, 199] => handler: 202

hi folks. i ran a simple snyk scan on the latest lucee docker image. i'm new to snyk scans but there sure seems like a lot of vulnerabilities identified: 19 critical, 28 high. debian 11 has 0 critical, 2 high. can anyone tell me why I shouldn't be worried? https://gist.github.com/jamiejackson/1b6adec3f23e505127ce36074c55c4c7

Heads-up whoever looks after the Lucee images on Docker Hub (I think @justincarter?) https://hub.docker.com/r/lucee/lucee - still refers to 5.3.9.133 as the "latest stable release" on the main page. Looks like it should be talking about 5.3.10.120?

The amount of detail in these DB exceptions is perhaps less ideal than it could be? Maybe?

Lucee 6 adds an optional onMissingKey listener for structs https://luceeserver.atlassian.net/browse/LDEV-3579 for shits n giggles, I hacked it to also fire on accessing struct items https://github.com/zspitzer/Lucee/commit/95df85300cb5bfd443699695680c3cd1da01819d the inspiration which was ironically for Lucee 5 and configImport (which uses a cfml struct internally) was to track which top level keys on the cfconfig.json where ignored / not supported https://github.com/lucee/Lucee/blob/5.3/core/src/main/java/lucee/runtime/tag/CFConfigImport.java#L204

In case anyone is wondering about that difference in CFDump output I was trying to figure out a few weeks ago, I figured it out, answer is in the original thread: https://cfml.slack.com/archives/C06TA0A9W/p1682025514099719

One of the new features in Lucee 6 is inline / sub components https://luceeserver.atlassian.net/browse/LDEV-4125

https://trycf.com/gist/2ba460bfe20b15b33a0b45ec9d5a27ba/lucee5?theme=monokai

function getHttpRequestHeaders(){}

The name [getHttpRequestHeaders] is already used by a built in Function on line 2

No it bloody isn't:

<https://docs.lucee.org/reference/functions/gethttprequestheaders.html>

404.

<https://cfdocs.org/gethttprequestheaders>

404 CF:

https://trycf.com/gist/40e48c92a45cb69052612527f5136ba5/lucee5?theme=monokai

["tahi", "rua", "toru", "wha"].each((v, i) => {
    writeOutput("#i#:#v#<br>")
})

[true, false].each((v, i) => {
    writeOutput("#i#:#v#<br>")
})

Errors with "Invalid Syntax Closing []] not found on line 6" stick a semi-colon after the first expression: all good. Will check Jira...

@zackster (and perhaps @justincarter) when's the next beta being flagged as "this is actually a milestone", and accordingly there'll be a docker image for it?