I'm attempting to add scopes like I see in the demo. But Avo::Scopes is not found. Is this not available in v2?

Is there anyway to hide the Download icon/button for the Fields field, but still allow users to play a video? I recognize the file is downloaded at that point, but would prefer to not display the download button for users...

Is there a way to disable edit and create options across the whole app? I know you can do it for specific users with the authorization config, but we want to disable it completely on community license so that people can just view data and use specific actions we code in.

Hello, I'm running the bookr demo application () and am facing an issue: any time I use an action (i.e., in the demo, "Delay booking"), the action completes successfully but I have an ugly error message in my logs:

Unpermitted parameter: :button. Context: { controller: Avo::ActionsController, action: handle, request: #<ActionDispatch::Request:0x00007fb03cbae4f8>, params: {"authenticity_token"=>"[FILTERED]", "action_id"=>"DelayBooking", "fields"=>{"avo_resource_ids"=>"1", "avo_selected_query"=>"", "number_of_hours"=>"1"}, "button"=>"", "controller"=>"avo/actions", "action"=>"handle", "resource_name"=>"bookings"} }
Unpermitted parameter: :button. Context: { controller: Avo::ActionsController, action: handle, request: #<ActionDispatch::Request:0x00007fb03cbae4f8>, params: {"authenticity_token"=>"[FILTERED]", "action_id"=>"DelayBooking", "fields"=>{"avo_resource_ids"=>"1", "avo_selected_query"=>"", "number_of_hours"=>"1"}, "button"=>"", "controller"=>"avo/actions", "action"=>"handle", "resource_name"=>"bookings"} }
Unpermitted parameter: :button. Context: { controller: Avo::ActionsController, action: handle, request: #<ActionDispatch::Request:0x00007fb03cbae4f8>, params: {"authenticity_token"=>"[FILTERED]", "action_id"=>"DelayBooking", "fields"=>{"avo_resource_ids"=>"1", "avo_selected_query"=>"", "number_of_hours"=>"1"}, "button"=>"", "controller"=>"avo/actions", "action"=>"handle", "resource_name"=>"bookings"} }

Is this happening only to me (Ubuntu 22.04 with Avo 2.33.1)?

Not sure if this is a bug or my doing something wrong. 1) enable config.buttons_on_form_footers 2) wrap resource fields in tabs. => top and bottom action buttons appear above the form If this is a bug, I'll disable buttons_on_form_footers and move along for now. 🙂

Is there any way to access the URL parameters from filters in an Action?

I have an Action, and I'd like to give it two inputs: a select input for "type of thing" and then a second select that's dynamically populated with record IDs based on the type of thing selected in the first select. This is very similar to the example shown at https://docs.avohq.io/2.0/stimulus-integration.html#custom-stimulus-controllers with the important difference that it's on an action rather than on a resource controller.

Hi guys how are you? I think that this new release broken the belongs_to field with polymorphic I got something like that (attachment) My current version (before upgrate) was 2.32.5 that works fine, but when I upgrade to 2.34 I got this issue

https://github.com/avo-hq/avo/issues/1764#issuecomment-1581787743 I filed this issue, but I'm wondering if anyone else has experienced this behavior: putting directives into

config/tailwind.config.js

that seem to be ignored by tailwind. Maybe it's just me?

if no one else is having this problem I'll close the issue.

Anybody have a good strategy for handling resources for different user roles? For example, an admin user can edit all the attributes of a Book but an editor is limited to a subset of attributes.

Is with_options visible:... with a block a good approach?

Can someone help me with this nested form? I'm working with a custom resource tool so I can display child **Message**s of a Chat, similar to a normal text chat UI. At the bottom, I want a nested form that allows one to post a new message. Currently, it updates the Chat succcessfully with no changes to the Messages. The message displays do work with

@resource.model.messages

, but not with creating new ones. Saving it manually with

message = @resource.model.messages.new

->

message.save

does work (after inputting

role

and

content

values). *Things that didn't work*: -

:message

or

:messages

as an argument for

fields_for

- changing the

extra_params

to

message:

(unknown attribute) I'm unsure if it's something I have to change in the resource controller, the

extra_params

, or the model. # resource tool partial

ruby
  <% if form.present? %>
  <% form.fields_for @resource.model.messages.new do |message| %>
    <%= form.label :message_content%>
    <%= message.text_field :content, value: 'message name', class: input_classes %>
    <%= message.hidden_field :role, value: 'user' %>
  <% end %>
<% end %>

# Chat Custom Resource

ruby
  self.title = :name
  self.includes = [:messages]
  self.extra_params = [messages: [:content, :role]]
  self.model_class = ::Chat

*Would like to have*: - any suggestions on how to enable this form on the Show view so it works as a live chat?

I am very interested in offering a similar feature soon! I will follow this!

@lemon-wall-20836 I'll bring Avo specific questions over here vs the JSP discord. Do you have any best practices for having two different 'sections' using Avo on the one app? One for Admins, one for regular users?

There’s no “sections” feature for that but it handles that very well using Pundit policies and having a roles system

If you override your to_param of your model, how do you have to update your model_resource so that way you can show/edit/destroy using that new field?

Has anybody else had an issue with actions not displaying for their model resource? I generate a toggle_hidden action then define action ToggleHidden in my video_resource I don't define anything in this action but nothing shows up and there is no error. I have defined filters and they work.

@lemon-wall-20836 https://main.avodemo.com/avo/resources/posts The images here are broken on the demo app.

@lemon-wall-20836 https://github.com/avo-hq/main.avodemo.com/blob/7598c9114ef47ca198e1b11077109458b8e415db/app/avo/resources/team.rb#L44 record should be model in the current implementation.

The docs here https://docs.avohq.io/2.0/fields/file.html

field :avatar, as: :file, is_image: true

recommend using this.

The is_image, is_audio, and is_video options are deprecated in favor of letting Active Storage figure out the type of the attachment. If Active Storage detects a file as an image, Avo will display it as an image. Same for audio and video files.

but this at the bottom says its depreciated. On my current version the image one display in the index without is_image.

Are scopes (tabs with prefilters) on the suer model https://main.avodemo.com/avo/resources/users available at Avo 2.0? I dont' see anything in the documentation.

I have a

dancer

:has_many couples and has a

profile_image

From the couple I would like to display the dancer image. Is there a reference somewhere on how to do something like this? 🤔

@lemon-wall-20836 Hi how are you i hope you are doing well I add filter in my resource and according to that filter i want to generate the request spec here is the article that i followed from the official DOC of avo https://docs.avohq.io/2.0/filters.html#dynamic-filter-options

Is there a simpler way to generate a variable number of fields without using nested records recipe approach? Specifically, I want a resource create page to consist of a variable number of text fields.

I am having some code loading issues with an Avo project. Specifically, it's not finding any of my actions. I'm not doing anything with include/eager-loading paths, I've cleared the bootsnap cache. I am monkey-patching

Avo::TabGroupBuilder

to add a couple methods, and using

Rails.configuration.to_prepare

to include a a couple modules in

Avo::ApplicationController

. Could either of those things be causing some interference?

One more day consulting all AVO networks and no version 3 😭

Good morning guys. Has anyone used the pg_search gem with AVO to use PostgreSQL FTS (Full Texto Search) and could you tell me how they applied it to the filters or ransack?

Any best practices on allowing/enabling user defined dashboards/cards?