My actor, apify.com/igolaizola/cian-ru-
# 💻creators-and-apify
i
My actor, apify.com/igolaizola/cian-ru-scraper, has a lower quality score due to these two issues: * Mark sensitive input fields as secret * Improve README However, I believe this may be a mistake in how the actor was processed. It doesn’t have any sensitive input fields, and the README follows the same pattern as my other actors, with descriptions, explanations, examples, etc. Could you please review this? @User
e
I'm collecting info about people whose READMEs were erroneously flagged so we can review them - can you please check if you have any outdated builds missing a README?
i
This is the same actor that received the "missing readme" email. So maybe related
Btw, this is an example of why a good UX like this one gives value. I've been able to spot lots of things to improve my actors to increase their quality: https://discord.com/channels/801163717915574323/1090592836044476426/1547745972648411146
It had some failed builds. Yesterday I launched a successful build just in case your processes were consuming simply the last build instead of the last successful build.
m
@igolaizola @Ella I think this is great idea where we can see what is missing basically full 'state' of actors... I think we need overhaul of UI 🙂
2 Views