Lalit Pagaria
05/04/2023, 1:33 PMGwen Shapira
05/06/2023, 1:02 AM1/100
chance of someone randomly getting through, which is indeed far too high for security.
But - they didn't show that those proposed approached fail 1/100
times.
And - at some point 1/extremely large number
is actually considered low enough probability for random guessing that it is secure enough.
He says:
And if we don’t get to 100%, I don’t think we’ve addressed the problem in a responsible way.Which sounds like a lot of executives when talking about security, but doesn't sound like most security professionals I've worked with - those do talk in terms of ROI and probabilities. Also, isn't his solution involves basically adding a human to the loop? to the human gets to review all the input/output for the AI? Given the prevalence of social engineering and phishing, I doubt this will work as intended... I am skeptical about a very specific point here... the talk as a whole has many points that I find insightful and tend to agree with.
Lalit Pagaria
05/06/2023, 5:49 AM