https://supabase.com/ logo
Join Discord
Powered by
# off-topic
  • t
    i saw it
  • l
    I'm getting 
    "FetchError: XMLHttpRequest is not defined"
    when making Supabase calls on a Cloudflare Pages deployment. I also noticed this issue (https://github.com/supabase/supabase-js/issues/154) which seemed relevant. I followed that advice, doing the 
    createClient
    with a defined fetch method — but I'm still encountering the error. Here's the request to Supabase:
    Copy code
    javascript
// import supabase from "$lib/db"
import { variables } from '$lib/variables';

import { createClient } from '@supabase/supabase-js'

const supabase = createClient( import.meta.env.VITE_SUPABASE_URL,
    import.meta.env.VITE_SUPABASE_ANON_KEY, { fetch: customFetch })

export async function post(request) {

const {data, error} = await supabase
.from('support_responses')
.insert({support_info: request.body.get('support_info'), introduction: request.body.get('introduction'), contact: request.body.get('contact'), loaded_location: request.body.get('loaded_address'), searched_location: request.body.get('address')})

if (error) {
return {
    status: 500,
    body: error
  }
}
else {

return {
    status: 200,
    body: {
      data
    }
  }
}

}
    Can someone help me write the 
    customFetch
    function that could make this work? EDIT: Solved, solution in the same GitHub thread. Had to update supabase to 1.28 and use this syntax
    Copy code
    const supabase = createClient( import.meta.env.VITE_SUPABASE_URL,
    import.meta.env.VITE_SUPABASE_ANON_KEY, { fetch: (...args) => fetch(...args)  })
  • h
    hey guys, is it fine to expose the user id (from auth) or is there any security risk even with rls enabled?
  • b
    The limitations of "functions" as a service seem widespread. What was your calculus when comparing creating Supabase functions compared to a container-based cloud function system? Here are some limitations I've read/experienced with cloud functions (1) managing medium to large projects is difficult with tiny functions spread throughout codebase (2) AWS Lambda seems to lock you in, (3) Google Cloud Functions don't allow you to specify hardware spec (e.g. if you need a more memory), incur a long cold start, and seem to be more expensive. If you have predefined containers with sensible defaults you'd have quite similar functionality to cloud functions , and if you allow users to create their own images, you'd be opening up the system to larger-scale projects and remove some of the vendor lock (which I think you mention is one of the core values you're shooting for). Any thoughts?
  • u
    hello 😄
  • u
    its okay, because the authentication company only share enough information through the api. if the company exposes it already, why cant we expose them
  • a
    I recently started with supabase. Just wanted to know how can we do schema migration in supabase? Any tool which you would recommend?
  • h
  • a
    I was reading this https://github.com/supabase/supabase/discussions/134#discussioncomment-1228861 This guy mentioned diff migration does not actually migrate data content in that case what would you suggest?
    s
    • 2
    • 2
  • s
    Migration tool
  • w
    if I'm using an API outside of supabase with supabase auth, is there a way for me to get a jwt for logged-in users that I can send to the API?
  • w
    I don't see anything in the user object
  • a
    When the user calls signIn, the user's jwt is returned as access_token in the response.
  • u
    I wan to integrate this provider in sms providers where do I start https://www.gupshup.io/developer/docs/bot-platform/guide/international-sms-api-documentation-en
  • v
    anyone facing query problem with supabase? i cant query from supbase
  • j
    I'm confused by how 
    in()
    is working
  • j
    .in("field", [1, 2]) // works
  • j
    but
  • j
    .in("field", []) // doesn't work
  • j
    the values are a function of state in my React app, so sometimes the values I'll have there will be empty. How do I pass empty/nothing there as value?
  • j
    Is there some sort of 
    .in("field", [*])
    or equivalent?
  • j
    To backup, I'm storing values between 1 and 5 for 
    field
    . I'm filtering my table by this field, and so I want to get any values I specify, or if I don't specify any, I want all the results
  • j
    I'd expect 
    .in("field", [])
    to return all results, but instead it returns none
  • j
    I could of course just do 
    .in("field", [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]);
    but that feels a bit weird(?)
  • g
    Well .in only finds records that match values in the array, so nothing matches []. I just would have logic to not add the .in into my query if the array.length = 0.
  • b
    Gentle ping to anyone at Supabase?
  • j
    Yeah that's true. That's what I should be doing. kk appreciated!
  • j
    Any idea by chance what that would look like?
    g
    m
    • 3
    • 11
  • j
    Copy code
    async function fetchCandidates() {
        let { data, error, status, count } = await supabase
            .from("users")
            .select("*")
            .eq("role", "developer")
            cssIsEmptyArray? '' : .in('css', filters.find(item =>item.skill === 'css').active) 
            
            return data
    }
  • j
    I need to do some kind of ternary like this I'm I'm thinking, but I can't think of the proper approach
1...142143144...392Latest