A further thought on governance: one issue DAOs attempt to solve is lack of participation in voting. Most DAOs use their governance token to help with this (offering rewards for voting, slashing if you don't vote, etc...), but since I'm looking at something identity-based w/o using a token, none of those methods will help. My thought is that voting power can degrade each time a vote is missed. Obviously an out needs to be given for those who don't have time to vote, so abstaining needs to be an option in each vote. But say you completely skip 3 votes, and then decide to vote on the 4th issue, perhaps 1% of your voting power can be lost from each vote that is not participated in, so instead of having a voting power of 1, after three missed votes you would have a voting power of 0.970299 (at least by my calculations, which nobody should trust!). Thus those who are more active in the community will have more of a say than those who ignore governance, but yet, they still have a voice when they do decide to vote. And again, my math skills are next to non-existent, so I could be wrong, but even if you continue to cut someones voting power by 1% after each missed vote, it should never go to zero, right?