<@U03AB36PTL7> hi, kevin, are there any plans to b...
# questions-and-troubleshooting
a
@Kevin Cai hi, kevin, are there any plans to backport this fix to the 4.0.x branch? • TABLET_HASH
k
not for now.
A few dependent PRs are not backported in branch 4.0, backporting this PR only will introduce a lot of code conflict and rework. The risk is bit high for 4.0 stability.
a
I haven’t looked into it closely yet, but do you foresee any major issues with backporting this to 4.0.x? I believe this feature could help address a critical issue where we experience latency spikes when a CN is added to the blacklist. Alternatively, would it be okay if I contributed the backport myself?
Ah, I see. So once the dependent PRs are backported, this PR could potentially be backported as well.
k
yeah, you can do the backport to your fork repo. But I don't think it will be accepted in SR repo in considering the 4.0.x series bugfix only for stability.
a
Ah, I see. So only bug fixes are backported to the 4.0.x branch. Thanks for the clarification, Kevin!
✅ 1