I’d really appreciate if we could work towards a definitive solution to either close or proceed to have them made fit for upstream.

Can somebody open up a branch in the starter for TW 4.0?

We are looking into this.

Hey Guys, I am happy to announce that solidus_static_content has been restored. Some questions: • Should we drop unsupported versions from the master / main and make a new release? • I have never updated a gem to a new version, could one of you handle that?

Out of curiosity: how many of you use webhooks? Is that something rarely used or very common? I assume most of us use services that allow tracking. Maybe it would be good to allow a setting that adds two additional shipping states (in_transit and delivered).

I saw that most stores doesn’t use the prefix

/t/

for taxons and

/products/

. Given that most stores probably don’t meet really performance hindering amounts of store categories and pages that hinder performance, do we want to remove it from the starter with maybe some comments or a configuration?

This message was deleted.

Hey, we should use the redesign to also solve following two issues: there should nerve be two menu options with the same name: 1. I suggest to rename Side Bar Main Menu “Products” to “Catalogue”

Hey, we are working out tailwind and schema on frontend, could somebody invest two minutes to merge this: https://github.com/solidusio/solidus/pull/6209 It adds brands to products made identically to primary taxon.

We have implemented groups separately from pricelists to have the possibility to provide it upstream more granular. It allows to assign default groups at sign up, has a group management interface and has been stripped of pricelists. This enables merchants to segment customers for analytical purposes by store or any metric they see fit. Do you want this into core?

👋 Hi everyone!

This message was deleted.

Holy hell, the spam won’t stop.

I wish it were more convenient to disable accounts from my phone… the spammers clearly noticed I was travelling in Japan and came out in full force.

This message was deleted.

I really wish the Solidus Rubydocs were hosted somewhere on Solidus.io, rather than on rubydoc.info. I always find Rubydoc really slow.

A message from Guru!

@tvdeyen got a spammer

Solidus just crossed 3 million downloads on RubyGems! Huge shout out to everyone in the Solidus community who has helped make the platform what it is today! https://supergood.software/solidus-hits-3-million-downloads/

This message was deleted.

hey everyone, i just published a summary blog post of everything that happened across the solidus org over the month of may. https://solidus.io/blog/project-status-may-2025 as far as i know, we’ve never done status updates like this for solidus before. let me know if you want to see more posts like this or if you have any suggestions. personally, i think this is going to help me see the big picture a little bit easier than my github notifications do. 🙂

Dear Community. The state_machines gem has been released in a 0.10.0 version last week. Unfortunately Solidus is not compatible right now causing

StackLevelTooDeep

errors. Right now we ask you to pin the

state_machines

Gem to 0.6.0

bundle add state_machines -v "< 0.10.0"

Thanks

hey everyone, i just published a project status update summarizing what happened in solidus-land this month: https://solidus.io/blog/project-status-june-2025 this is still just the second one of these i’ve done and it’s a bit of an experiment. let me know if you have comments, questions, or suggestions to make these things more valuable.

The solidus_volume_pricing gem doesn't build the "test" pipeline for some reason, and I'd like to work on that extension. Can someone from the core team get it to build again (I suspect it's just a Button in Github)? https://github.com/solidusio-contrib/solidus_volume_pricing

See e.g. https://github.com/solidusio-contrib/solidus_volume_pricing/pull/76

I'm out of my wits. I keep on getting this error in the SolidusVolumePricing test suite, and I'm not sure how to fix it. Has anyone come across it before? https://github.com/solidusio-contrib/solidus_volume_pricing/actions/runs/16624230758/job/47036149498

Can I have a merge for this uncontroversial PR? https://github.com/solidusio-contrib/solidus_volume_pricing/pull/79 ?

Thank you @Jared Norman - here's another small one that leverages Flickwerk on solidus_volume_pricing: https://github.com/solidusio-contrib/solidus_volume_pricing/pull/76

hi all, here’s another one of those monthly project updates. happy august! cheers! https://solidus.io/blog/project-status-july-2025

Just released a new version of the patch loader

flickwerk

with bugfixes and documentation improvements by our lovely community. We encourage everybody to migrate from "Decorators" / "Overrides" (that never should have been called like this) to use flickwerk instead. Many of solidus extensions have been migrated already. https://rubygems.org/gems/flickwerk/versions/0.3.6