Good thread that lands on "use vite" just above. I...
# generalm
Matt Morgan
05/20/2022, 8:08 PMGood thread that lands on "use vite" just above. I'm curious if anybody is using vitest for testing stacks and constructs. The latest SST examples seem to use it to test lambda functions, but I haven't seen - or got it to work - for unit testing stacks and constructs yet. Can we yeet jest yet?
r
Ross Coundon
05/20/2022, 8:09 PMWe intend to use it, I tried to switch our tests over and there were some incompatibilities despite the Jest-like UI. So it’s on the to-do list
t
thdxr
05/20/2022, 8:10 PMI just yeeted jest on the sst codebase itself lol
thdxr
05/20/2022, 8:10 PMwent hard this morning/last night and got it all moved over without changing much besides importing from vitest
thdxr
05/20/2022, 8:11 PMI haven't published stack test examples yet (although @manitej I think is updating one right now)
reason being is I noticed a design issue with the previous way we were doing stack tests. Because we have
stacks/index.tsapp.setDefaultFunctionPropsm
Matt Morgan
05/20/2022, 8:12 PMHa. I looked earlier today and it was still on jest then. 😄
Matt Morgan
05/20/2022, 8:14 PMThat's great. I'll look forward to seeing those. I really want to move a lot of stuff we have to vitest, including non-serverless stuff if I can mange it.
Matt Morgan
05/20/2022, 8:28 PMOkay, got an SST stack onto vitest very easily, but my CDK stack without SST (sorry, have many of those ATM) doesn’t behave as well.